VTI vs WCBR
Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF vs WisdomTree Cybersecurity Fund
Which is better, VTI or WCBR?
Large Cap Blend against All Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over the full window, WCBR over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VTI | WCBR |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.45% |
| AUM | $690.1B | $180M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.03% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 3,524 | 32 |
| YTD Return | +13.35% | +71.28%Best |
| 1Y Return | +15.92% | +46.37%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +23.41% | +32.84%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.83% | +13.38%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.2%Best | 29.1% |
| Max Drawdown | -25.4%Best | -52.3% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $18,286 | $18,736Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 33.3%Best | 57.8% |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | WisdomTree Investments |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | All Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 24, 2001 | Jan 28, 2021 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 28, 2021 to Oct 2, 2026 (5.7 years).
VTI vs WCBR growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 5.7 years both funds cover.
VTI vs WCBR Performance
Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US) and WisdomTree Cybersecurity Fund (WCBR) is an ETF from WisdomTree Investments. Over the past year VTI returned +15.92% while WCBR returned +46.37%. Year to date, VTI is up 13.35% versus a gain of 71.28% for WCBR.
Over three years, VTI compounded at +23.41% per year against +32.84% for WCBR; over five years the annualized figures are +12.83% and +13.38% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +13.69% annualized vs +12.00%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
WCBR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 29.1% compared with 15.2% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -25.4% for VTI and -52.3% for WCBR. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.51. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VTI charges 0.03% per year while WCBR charges 0.45%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $45 annually, a gap of $42 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VTI currently yields 1.03% against 0.00% for WCBR.
Holdings Overlap
1.2% of VTI's money is in holdings WCBR also owns. 90.5% of WCBR's money is in holdings VTI also owns.
Most of WCBR is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
The two holdings books were reported 46 days apart, VTI as of Jul 31, 2026 and WCBR as of Sep 15, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
20 positions in common, counted across the 3,463 positions we hold weights for in VTI and 25 in WCBR, against full books of 3,524 and 32.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1 positions for WCBR that do not appear in our book for VTI (0.0% of the fund), and 1,134 for VTI that do not appear in WCBR (96.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in VTI | Weight in WCBR | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| CRWDCrowdstrike Holdings Inc | 0.26% | 8.00% | 7.74% |
| OKTAOkta Inc. | 0.03% | 6.66% | 6.63% |
| PANWPalo Alto Networks, Inc | 0.38% | 6.28% | 5.90% |
| SSentinelOne Inc | 0.01% | 6.16% | 6.15% |
| FTNTFortinet Inc | 0.14% | 5.69% | 5.55% |
| RBRKRubrik Inc-A | 0.02% | 5.24% | 5.22% |
| DDOGDatadog Inc | 0.12% | 5.10% | 4.98% |
| NTSKNetskope Inc-Cl A | 0.00% | 5.02% | 5.02% |
| TENBTenable Holdings Inc | 0.01% | 4.88% | 4.87% |
| ZSZscaler, Inc | 0.02% | 4.74% | 4.72% |
90.5% of WCBR is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VTI or WCBR?
VTI has an expense ratio of 0.03% while WCBR charges 0.45%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $42 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, VTI or WCBR?
Over the past year VTI returned +15.92% vs +46.37% for WCBR, so WCBR leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), VTI annualized +13.69% vs +12.00% for WCBR. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, VTI or WCBR?
WCBR has been the more volatile fund at 29.1% annualized versus 15.2% for VTI. Worst drawdown: VTI -25.4% vs WCBR -52.3%.
Should I hold both VTI and WCBR?
VTI and WCBR have a monthly-return correlation of 0.51, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between VTI and WCBR?
90.5% of WCBR's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 90.5% of WCBR's is in holdings VTI also owns. They hold 20 positions in common, counted across the 3,463 positions we hold weights for in VTI and 25 in WCBR.
Which pays a higher dividend, VTI or WCBR?
VTI yields 1.03% while WCBR yields 0.00%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is WCBR better than VTI?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over the full window, WCBR over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.