VTI vs XRPC
Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF vs Canary XRP ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VTI | XRPC | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.50% | |
| AUM | $666.9B | $234M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.07% | 0.00% | |
| Holdings | 3,543 | 2 | |
| YTD Return | +13.14% | -30.85% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.35% | - | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.83% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.01% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.3% | - | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.6% | -57.1% | |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | Canary Capital Group LLC | |
| Category | Equity | Alternative | |
| Inception | May 24, 2001 | Nov 13, 2025 |
VTI vs XRPC Performance
Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US) and Canary XRP ETF (XRPC) is a ETF from Canary Capital Group LLC. Year to date, VTI is up 13.14% versus a loss of 30.85% for XRPC.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.6% for VTI and -57.1% for XRPC. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VTI charges 0.03% per year while XRPC charges 0.50%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $50 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VTI currently yields 1.07% against 0.00% for XRPC.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VTI or XRPC?
VTI has an expense ratio of 0.03% while XRPC charges 0.50%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $47 per year of difference.
Which pays a higher dividend, VTI or XRPC?
VTI yields 1.07% while XRPC yields 0.00%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.