VTI vs YBTY
Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF vs GraniteShares YieldBoost TopYielders ETF
Which is better, VTI or YBTY?
Large Cap Blend against Option Writing.
VTI has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VTI | YBTY |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 1.38% |
| AUM | $666.9B | $2M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.03% | 77.44% |
| Holdings | 3,543 | 18 |
| YTD Return | +12.30%Best | -26.65% |
| 1Y Return | +16.08% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.01% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.36% | - |
| Top 10 Weight | 33.3% | - |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | GraniteShares |
| Category | Equity | Alternative |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Option Writing |
| Inception | May 24, 2001 | Dec 16, 2025 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
VTI vs YBTY growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
VTI vs YBTY Performance
Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US) and GraniteShares YieldBoost TopYielders ETF (YBTY) is an ETF from GraniteShares. Year to date, VTI is up 12.30% versus a loss of 26.65% for YBTY.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VTI charges 0.03% per year while YBTY charges 1.38%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $138 annually, a gap of $135 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VTI currently yields 1.03% against 77.44% for YBTY.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 3,463 holdings in VTI and 8 in YBTY, totalling 98.1% and 100.0% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 3,463 positions we hold weights for in VTI and 8 in YBTY, against full books of 3,543 and 18.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 8 positions for YBTY that do not appear in our book for VTI (100.0% of the fund), and 1,150 for VTI that do not appear in YBTY (97.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of VTI and YBTY you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VTI or YBTY?
VTI has an expense ratio of 0.03% while YBTY charges 1.38%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $135 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, VTI or YBTY?
VTI yields 1.03% while YBTY yields 77.44%, so YBTY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is YBTY better than VTI?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.