VTI vs ZCBF
Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF vs Global X Zero Coupon Bond 2034 ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VTI | ZCBF | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.07% | |
| AUM | $666.9B | $970,301.99 | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.07% | 2.09% | |
| Holdings | 3,543 | 6 | |
| YTD Return | +14.82% | -1.18% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.43% | - | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.93% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.34% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.4% | - | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.6% | -4.7% | |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | Global X by mirae Asset | |
| Category | Equity | Fixed Income | |
| Inception | May 24, 2001 | Jan 6, 2026 |
VTI vs ZCBF Performance
Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US) and Global X Zero Coupon Bond 2034 ETF (ZCBF) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset. Year to date, VTI is up 14.82% versus a loss of 1.18% for ZCBF.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.6% for VTI and -4.7% for ZCBF. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VTI charges 0.03% per year while ZCBF charges 0.07%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $7 annually, a gap of $4 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VTI currently yields 1.07% against 2.09% for ZCBF.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VTI or ZCBF?
VTI has an expense ratio of 0.03% while ZCBF charges 0.07%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $4 per year of difference.
Which pays a higher dividend, VTI or ZCBF?
VTI yields 1.07% while ZCBF yields 2.09%, so ZCBF currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.