VYM vs WEBL
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF vs Direxion Daily Dow Jones Internet Bull 3X ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 616 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VYM | WEBL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.04% | 0.96% | |
| AUM | $81.6B | $109M | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.24% | 0.17% | |
| Holdings | 616 | 47 | |
| YTD Return | +14.84% | +16.73% | |
| 1Y Return | +20.88% | -4.77% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.34% | +38.37% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.04% | -19.59% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.6% | 73.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -58.8% | -94.4% | |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | Direxion Shares ETF Trust | |
| Category | Equity | Alternative | |
| Inception | Nov 10, 2006 | Nov 7, 2019 |
VYM vs WEBL Performance
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US) and Direxion Daily Dow Jones Internet Bull 3X ETF (WEBL) is a ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust. Over the past year VYM returned +20.88% while WEBL returned -4.77%. Year to date, VYM is up 14.84% versus a gain of 16.73% for WEBL.
Over three years, VYM compounded at +18.34% per year against +38.37% for WEBL; over five years the annualized figures are +12.04% and -19.59% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +7.01% annualized vs +4.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
WEBL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 73.1% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -58.8% for VYM and -94.4% for WEBL. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.55. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VYM charges 0.04% per year while WEBL charges 0.96%. On a $10,000 position that is $4 vs $96 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VYM currently yields 2.24% against 0.17% for WEBL.
Holdings Overlap
VYM and WEBL share 4 holdings out of 641 unique holdings combined, representing a 3.3% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VYM or WEBL?
VYM has an expense ratio of 0.04% while WEBL charges 0.96%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $92 per year of difference.
Which performed better, VYM or WEBL?
Over the past year VYM returned +20.88% vs -4.77% for WEBL, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), VYM annualized +7.01% vs +4.01% for WEBL. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, VYM or WEBL?
WEBL has been the more volatile fund at 73.1% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: VYM -58.8% vs WEBL -94.4%.
Should I hold both VYM and WEBL?
VYM and WEBL have a monthly-return correlation of 0.55, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between VYM and WEBL?
VYM and WEBL share 4 common holdings with a 3.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 641 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, VYM or WEBL?
VYM yields 2.24% while WEBL yields 0.17%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.