VOO vs WEBL
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF vs Direxion Daily Dow Jones Internet Bull 3X ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VOO | WEBL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.96% | |
| AUM | $979.0B | $83M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 0.19% | |
| Holdings | 509 | 47 | |
| YTD Return | +13.80% | +12.07% | |
| 1Y Return | +23.71% | -2.48% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.50% | +35.23% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.44% | -18.71% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.1% | 73.0% | |
| Max Drawdown | -34.3% | -94.4% | |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | Direxion Shares ETF Trust | |
| Category | Equity | Alternative | |
| Inception | Sep 7, 2010 | Nov 7, 2019 |
VOO vs WEBL Performance
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US) and Direxion Daily Dow Jones Internet Bull 3X ETF (WEBL) is a ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust. Over the past year VOO returned +23.71% while WEBL returned -2.48%. Year to date, VOO is up 13.80% versus a gain of 12.07% for WEBL.
Over three years, VOO compounded at +21.50% per year against +35.23% for WEBL; over five years the annualized figures are +13.44% and -18.71% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.58% annualized vs +3.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
WEBL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 73.0% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -34.3% for VOO and -94.4% for WEBL. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.82. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VOO charges 0.03% per year while WEBL charges 0.96%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $96 annually, a gap of $93 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VOO currently yields 1.09% against 0.19% for WEBL.
Holdings Overlap
VOO and WEBL share 24 holdings out of 523 unique holdings combined, representing a 14.5% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VOO or WEBL?
VOO has an expense ratio of 0.03% while WEBL charges 0.96%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $93 per year of difference.
Which performed better, VOO or WEBL?
Over the past year VOO returned +23.71% vs -2.48% for WEBL, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), VOO annualized +13.58% vs +3.42% for WEBL. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, VOO or WEBL?
WEBL has been the more volatile fund at 73.0% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: VOO -34.3% vs WEBL -94.4%.
Should I hold both VOO and WEBL?
VOO and WEBL have a monthly-return correlation of 0.82, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between VOO and WEBL?
VOO and WEBL share 24 common holdings with a 14.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 523 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, VOO or WEBL?
VOO yields 1.09% while WEBL yields 0.19%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.