VTI vs WEBL
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF vs Direxion Daily Dow Jones Internet Bull 3X ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VTI | WEBL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.96% | |
| AUM | $663.5B | $83M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.07% | 0.19% | |
| Holdings | 3,543 | 47 | |
| YTD Return | +13.87% | +12.99% | |
| 1Y Return | +23.31% | +1.75% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.17% | +36.68% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.23% | -18.05% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.3% | 73.0% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.6% | -94.4% | |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | Direxion Shares ETF Trust | |
| Category | Equity | Alternative | |
| Inception | May 24, 2001 | Nov 7, 2019 |
VTI vs WEBL Performance
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US) and Direxion Daily Dow Jones Internet Bull 3X ETF (WEBL) is a ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust. Over the past year VTI returned +23.31% while WEBL returned +1.75%. Year to date, VTI is up 13.87% versus a gain of 12.99% for WEBL.
Over three years, VTI compounded at +21.17% per year against +36.68% for WEBL; over five years the annualized figures are +12.23% and -18.05% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.13% annualized vs +3.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
WEBL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 73.0% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.6% for VTI and -94.4% for WEBL. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.84. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VTI charges 0.03% per year while WEBL charges 0.96%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $96 annually, a gap of $93 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VTI currently yields 1.07% against 0.19% for WEBL.
Holdings Overlap
VTI and WEBL share 37 holdings out of 2788 unique holdings combined, representing a 13.2% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VTI or WEBL?
VTI has an expense ratio of 0.03% while WEBL charges 0.96%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $93 per year of difference.
Which performed better, VTI or WEBL?
Over the past year VTI returned +23.31% vs +1.75% for WEBL, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), VTI annualized +8.13% vs +3.54% for WEBL. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, VTI or WEBL?
WEBL has been the more volatile fund at 73.0% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: VTI -56.6% vs WEBL -94.4%.
Should I hold both VTI and WEBL?
VTI and WEBL have a monthly-return correlation of 0.84, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between VTI and WEBL?
VTI and WEBL share 37 common holdings with a 13.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2788 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, VTI or WEBL?
VTI yields 1.07% while WEBL yields 0.19%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.