VOO vs XSVN
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF vs BondBloxx Bloomberg Seven Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VOO | XSVN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $997.4B | $392M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.08% | 4.13% | |
| Holdings | 509 | 39 | |
| YTD Return | +12.68% | -1.05% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.87% | +1.45% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.06% | +3.84% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.95% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.1% | 6.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -34.3% | -9.4% | |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | BondBloxx | |
| Category | Equity | Fixed Income | |
| Inception | Sep 7, 2010 | Sep 13, 2022 |
VOO vs XSVN Performance
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US) and BondBloxx Bloomberg Seven Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XSVN) is a ETF from BondBloxx. Over the past year VOO returned +21.87% while XSVN returned +1.45%. Year to date, VOO is up 12.68% versus a loss of 1.05% for XSVN.
Over three years, VOO compounded at +22.06% per year against +3.84% for XSVN. Across the full 4-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.47% annualized vs +2.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.1% compared with 6.6% for XSVN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -34.3% for VOO and -9.4% for XSVN. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.44. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VOO charges 0.03% per year while XSVN charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $5 annually, a gap of $2 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VOO currently yields 1.08% against 4.13% for XSVN.
Holdings Overlap
VOO and XSVN share 0 holdings out of 530 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VOO or XSVN?
VOO has an expense ratio of 0.03% while XSVN charges 0.05%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $2 per year of difference.
Which performed better, VOO or XSVN?
Over the past year VOO returned +21.87% vs +1.45% for XSVN, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), VOO annualized +13.47% vs +2.16% for XSVN. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, VOO or XSVN?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.1% annualized versus 6.6% for XSVN. Worst drawdown: VOO -34.3% vs XSVN -9.4%.
Should I hold both VOO and XSVN?
VOO and XSVN have a monthly-return correlation of 0.44, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between VOO and XSVN?
VOO and XSVN share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 530 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, VOO or XSVN?
VOO yields 1.08% while XSVN yields 4.13%, so XSVN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.