AOD vs ETW
vs
AOD vs ETW
Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund vs Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Global Buy-Write Opportunities Fund
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
ETW has a lower expense ratio. AOD delivered stronger 1-year returns. ETW offers more diversification with 260 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AOD | ETW |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | Aberdeen | Eaton Vance |
| Expense Ratio | 1.16% | 1.10% |
| AUM | $1.0B | $936M |
| Dividend Yield | 11.72% | 7.41% |
| Holdings Count | 86 | 296 |
| Inception Date | 2007-01-26 | 2005-09-28 |
| Investment Style | Large Cap Blend | Multi Alternative |
| 1-Month Return | +2.95% | +2.57% |
| YTD Return | +10.82% | +6.99% |
| 1-Year Return | +29.09% | +25.51% |
| 3-Year Return | +16.95% | +16.36% |
| 5-Year Return | +8.60% | +7.42% |
| 10-Year Return | +14.63% | +12.68% |
| Buy Score | 59 | 60 |
| Momentum Score | 66 | 52 |
| Value Score | 49 | 54 |
Holdings Overlap
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, AOD or ETW?
AOD has an expense ratio of 1.16% while ETW charges 1.10%. ETW is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do AOD and ETW hold the same stocks?
AOD and ETW share 26 common holdings with a 21.1% weight overlap. They hold 319 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, AOD or ETW?
Over the past year, AOD returned +29.09% while ETW returned +25.51%. AOD outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.