AAPW vs VTI

AAPW vs VTI

Which is better, AAPW or VTI?

AAPW has been ahead.

VTI has a lower expense ratio. AAPW led over 1Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: VTIHigher Returns: AAPW

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricAAPWVTI
Expense Ratio1.00%0.03%Best
AUM$42M$666.9B
Dividend Yield29.56%1.03%
Holdings63,543
YTD Return+8.94%+11.65%Best
1Y Return+32.56%Best+17.34%
3Y Return (annualized)-+20.35%
5Y Return (annualized)-+11.72%
Volatility (annualized)25.8%13.2%Best
Max Drawdown-35.3%-19.3%Best
$10,000 over 1.6 years$13,002Best$12,621
Fund FamilyRoundhill InvestmentsVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionFeb 19, 2025May 24, 2001

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.6 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 19, 2025 to Sep 10, 2026 (1.6 years).

AAPW vs VTI growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.6 years both funds cover.

AAPW vs VTI Performance

Roundhill AAPL WeeklyPay ETF (AAPW) is an ETF from Roundhill Investments and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year AAPW returned +32.56% while VTI returned +17.34%. Year to date, AAPW is up 8.94% versus a gain of 11.65% for VTI.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

AAPW has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 25.8% compared with 13.2% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -35.3% for AAPW and -19.3% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.53. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.

Fees and Cost Over Time

AAPW charges 1.00% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $100 vs $3 annually, a gap of $97 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AAPW currently yields 29.56% against 1.03% for VTI.

Holdings Overlap

We hold position weights for 2 holdings in AAPW and 2,787 in VTI, totalling 37.0% and 90.6% of the two funds. Neither is a share of a fund we can divide by, so no overlap percentage is shown here. Within what we can see, 1 positions appear in both.

1 positions in common, counted across the 2 positions we hold weights for in AAPW and 2,787 in VTI, against full books of 6 and 3,543.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in AAPWWeight in VTIDifference
AAPLApple, Inc12.17%5.84%6.33%

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of AAPW and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

AAPWVTI

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, AAPW or VTI?

AAPW has an expense ratio of 1.00% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $97 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, AAPW or VTI?

Over the past year AAPW returned +32.56% vs +17.34% for VTI, so AAPW leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), AAPW annualized +17.83% vs +15.66% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, AAPW or VTI?

AAPW has been the more volatile fund at 25.8% annualized versus 13.2% for VTI. Worst drawdown: AAPW -35.3% vs VTI -19.3%.

Should I hold both AAPW and VTI?

AAPW and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.53, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, AAPW or VTI?

AAPW yields 29.56% while VTI yields 1.03%, so AAPW currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VTI better than AAPW?

VTI has a lower expense ratio. AAPW led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.