AAPW vs VOO
Roundhill AAPL WeeklyPay ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. AAPW delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AAPW | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.00% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $39M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 30.47% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 6 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +4.77% | +12.25% | |
| 1Y Return | +27.81% | +20.92% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.79% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.05% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 26.6% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -35.3% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Roundhill Investments | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 19, 2025 | Sep 7, 2010 |
AAPW vs VOO Performance
Roundhill AAPL WeeklyPay ETF (AAPW) is a ETF from Roundhill Investments and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year AAPW returned +27.81% while VOO returned +20.92%. Year to date, AAPW is up 4.77% versus a gain of 12.25% for VOO.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
AAPW has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 26.6% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -35.3% for AAPW and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.56. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AAPW charges 1.00% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $100 vs $3 annually, a gap of $97 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AAPW currently yields 30.47% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
AAPW and VOO share 1 holdings out of 506 unique holdings combined, representing a 6.6% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in AAPW | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AAPL | 13.06% | 6.59% | 6.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AAPW or VOO?
AAPW has an expense ratio of 1.00% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $97 per year of difference.
Which performed better, AAPW or VOO?
Over the past year AAPW returned +27.81% vs +20.92% for VOO, so AAPW leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), AAPW annualized +15.53% vs +13.45% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, AAPW or VOO?
AAPW has been the more volatile fund at 26.6% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: AAPW -35.3% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both AAPW and VOO?
AAPW and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.56, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between AAPW and VOO?
AAPW and VOO share 1 common holdings with a 6.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 506 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, AAPW or VOO?
AAPW yields 30.47% while VOO yields 1.08%, so AAPW currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.