AAPW vs VXUS
Roundhill AAPL WeeklyPay ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 8,747 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AAPW | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.99% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $46M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 8.27% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 6 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +2.81% | +15.24% | |
| 1Y Return | +20.17% | +26.32% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +19.85% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.23% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 26.7% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -35.3% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Roundhill Investments | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 19, 2025 | Jan 26, 2011 |
AAPW vs VXUS Performance
Roundhill AAPL WeeklyPay ETF (AAPW) is a ETF from Roundhill Investments and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year AAPW returned +20.17% while VXUS returned +26.32%. Year to date, AAPW is up 2.81% versus a gain of 15.24% for VXUS.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
AAPW has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 26.7% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -35.3% for AAPW and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.31. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AAPW charges 0.99% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $99 vs $5 annually, a gap of $94 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AAPW currently yields 8.27% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
AAPW and VXUS share 0 holdings out of 7863 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AAPW or VXUS?
AAPW has an expense ratio of 0.99% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $94 per year of difference.
Which performed better, AAPW or VXUS?
Over the past year AAPW returned +20.17% vs +26.32% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), AAPW annualized +14.27% vs +4.89% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, AAPW or VXUS?
AAPW has been the more volatile fund at 26.7% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: AAPW -35.3% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both AAPW and VXUS?
AAPW and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.31, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between AAPW and VXUS?
AAPW and VXUS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7863 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, AAPW or VXUS?
AAPW yields 8.27% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so AAPW currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.