ABCS vs VTI
Alpha Blue Capital US Small-Mid Cap Dynamic ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, ABCS or VTI?
Mid Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 39.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ABCS | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.42% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $12M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.11% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 106 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +13.92%Best | +12.28% |
| 1Y Return | +16.68% | +16.78%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.89% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.94% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.9% | 12.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -20.5% | -19.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.7 years | $14,400 | $16,456Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 39.6% | 33.3%Best |
| Fund Family | Alpha Blue Capital | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Dec 20, 2023 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.7 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 20, 2023 to Sep 17, 2026 (2.7 years).
ABCS vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.7 years both funds cover.
ABCS vs VTI Performance
Alpha Blue Capital US Small-Mid Cap Dynamic ETF (ABCS) is an ETF from Alpha Blue Capital and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ABCS returned +16.68% while VTI returned +16.78%. Year to date, ABCS is up 13.92% versus a gain of 12.28% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ABCS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.9% compared with 12.1% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -20.5% for ABCS and -19.3% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.72. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ABCS charges 0.42% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $42 vs $3 annually, a gap of $39 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ABCS currently yields 1.11% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
68.2% of ABCS's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 3.5% of VTI's money is in holdings ABCS also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
98 positions in common, counted across the 105 positions we hold weights for in ABCS and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 106 and 3,543.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,062 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for ABCS (94.1% of the fund), and 7 for ABCS that do not appear in VTI (31.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ABCS | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| ELVElevance Health Inc | 2.08% | 0.11% | 1.97% |
| GPNGlobal Payments Inc. | 2.05% | 0.03% | 2.02% |
| AMPAmeriprise Financial Inc | 1.77% | 0.07% | 1.70% |
| THCTenet Healthcare Corp Common Stock Usd 0.05 | 1.70% | 0.03% | 1.67% |
| HPEHewlett Packard Enterprise Co | 1.55% | 0.09% | 1.46% |
| USBUS Bancorp | 1.35% | 0.14% | 1.21% |
| GEHCGe Healthcare Technologies Inc | 1.38% | 0.04% | 1.34% |
| ADBEAdobe Systems | 1.24% | 0.14% | 1.10% |
| LADLithia Motors Inc | 1.31% | 0.01% | 1.30% |
| BKNGBooking Holdings, Inc. | 1.08% | 0.21% | 0.87% |
68.2% of ABCS is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ABCS or VTI?
ABCS has an expense ratio of 0.42% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $39 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ABCS or VTI?
Over the past year ABCS returned +16.68% vs +16.78% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ABCS or VTI?
ABCS has been the more volatile fund at 13.9% annualized versus 12.1% for VTI. Worst drawdown: ABCS -20.5% vs VTI -19.3%.
Should I hold both ABCS and VTI?
ABCS and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.72, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between ABCS and VTI?
68.2% of ABCS's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 3.5% of VTI's is in holdings ABCS also owns. They hold 98 positions in common, counted across the 105 positions we hold weights for in ABCS and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, ABCS or VTI?
ABCS yields 1.11% while VTI yields 1.03%, so ABCS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than ABCS?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 39.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.