ABCS vs VYM
Alpha Blue Capital US Small-Mid Cap Dynamic ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 616 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ABCS | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.42% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $13M | $81.6B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.12% | 2.24% | |
| Holdings | 106 | 616 | |
| YTD Return | +18.29% | +14.84% | |
| 1Y Return | +19.86% | +20.88% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +18.34% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.04% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.9% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -20.5% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Alpha Blue Capital | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 20, 2023 | Nov 10, 2006 |
ABCS vs VYM Performance
Alpha Blue Capital US Small-Mid Cap Dynamic ETF (ABCS) is a ETF from Alpha Blue Capital and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ABCS returned +19.86% while VYM returned +20.88%. Year to date, ABCS is up 18.29% versus a gain of 14.84% for VYM.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VYM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.6% compared with 13.9% for ABCS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -20.5% for ABCS and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.90. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ABCS charges 0.42% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $42 vs $4 annually, a gap of $38 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ABCS currently yields 1.12% against 2.24% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
ABCS and VYM share 44 holdings out of 664 unique holdings combined, representing a 4.4% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ABCS or VYM?
ABCS has an expense ratio of 0.42% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $38 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ABCS or VYM?
Over the past year ABCS returned +19.86% vs +20.88% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), ABCS annualized +16.39% vs +7.01% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ABCS or VYM?
VYM has been the more volatile fund at 14.6% annualized versus 13.9% for ABCS. Worst drawdown: ABCS -20.5% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both ABCS and VYM?
ABCS and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.90, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between ABCS and VYM?
ABCS and VYM share 44 common holdings with a 4.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 664 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ABCS or VYM?
ABCS yields 1.12% while VYM yields 2.24%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.