ABCS vs VYM
Alpha Blue Capital US Small-Mid Cap Dynamic ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, ABCS or VYM?
Mid Cap Value against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.90. VYM is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 39.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ABCS | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.42% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $12M | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.11% | 2.22% |
| Holdings | 106 | 613 |
| YTD Return | +12.87%Best | +11.35% |
| 1Y Return | +14.62% | +15.34%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +17.22% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.30% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.0% | 10.3%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -20.5% | -14.5%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.7 years | $14,261 | $15,417Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 39.6% | 26.1%Best |
| Fund Family | Alpha Blue Capital | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Dec 20, 2023 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.7 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 20, 2023 to Sep 18, 2026 (2.7 years).
ABCS vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.7 years both funds cover.
ABCS vs VYM Performance
Alpha Blue Capital US Small-Mid Cap Dynamic ETF (ABCS) is an ETF from Alpha Blue Capital and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ABCS returned +14.62% while VYM returned +15.34%. Year to date, ABCS is up 12.87% versus a gain of 11.35% for VYM.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ABCS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.0% compared with 10.3% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -20.5% for ABCS and -14.5% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.90. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ABCS charges 0.42% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $42 vs $4 annually, a gap of $38 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ABCS currently yields 1.11% against 2.22% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
31.4% of ABCS's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 4.5% of VYM's money is in holdings ABCS also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
46 positions in common, counted across the 105 positions we hold weights for in ABCS and 557 in VYM, against full books of 106 and 613.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 483 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for ABCS (92.8% of the fund), and 57 for ABCS that do not appear in VYM (66.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ABCS | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| ELVElevance Health Inc | 2.08% | 0.32% | 1.76% |
| GPNGlobal Payments Inc. | 2.05% | 0.06% | 1.99% |
| AMPAmeriprise Financial Inc | 1.77% | 0.20% | 1.57% |
| HPEHewlett Packard Enterprise Co | 1.55% | 0.26% | 1.29% |
| USBUS Bancorp | 1.35% | 0.40% | 0.95% |
| CVSCvs Corp | 0.92% | 0.54% | 0.38% |
| CDWCDW Corporation | 1.08% | 0.08% | 1.00% |
| SLMSlm Corp | 1.07% | 0.02% | 1.05% |
| KDPKeurig Dr Pepper Inc (kdp Us) | 0.91% | 0.16% | 0.75% |
| OTISOtis Worldwide | 0.95% | 0.11% | 0.84% |
31.4% of ABCS is already inside VYM.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ABCS or VYM?
ABCS has an expense ratio of 0.42% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $38 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ABCS or VYM?
Over the past year ABCS returned +14.62% vs +15.34% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ABCS or VYM?
ABCS has been the more volatile fund at 14.0% annualized versus 10.3% for VYM. Worst drawdown: ABCS -20.5% vs VYM -14.5%.
Should I hold both ABCS and VYM?
ABCS and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.90, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between ABCS and VYM?
31.4% of ABCS's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 4.5% of VYM's is in holdings ABCS also owns. They hold 46 positions in common, counted across the 105 positions we hold weights for in ABCS and 557 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, ABCS or VYM?
ABCS yields 1.11% while VYM yields 2.22%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than ABCS?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.90. VYM is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 39.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.