ABCS vs QQQ
Alpha Blue Capital US Small-Mid Cap Dynamic ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, ABCS or QQQ?
Mid Cap Value against Large Cap Growth.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y and the full window. ABCS is less concentrated, with 39.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ABCS | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.42% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $12M | $483.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.11% | 0.44% |
| Holdings | 106 | 107 |
| YTD Return | +12.87% | +17.95%Best |
| 1Y Return | +14.62% | +21.77%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +25.63% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.24% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.0%Best | 16.9% |
| Max Drawdown | -20.5%Best | -22.8% |
| $10,000 over 2.7 years | $14,261 | $17,968Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 39.6%Best | 46.5% |
| Fund Family | Alpha Blue Capital | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Value | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Dec 20, 2023 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.7 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 20, 2023 to Sep 18, 2026 (2.7 years).
ABCS vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.7 years both funds cover.
ABCS vs QQQ Performance
Alpha Blue Capital US Small-Mid Cap Dynamic ETF (ABCS) is an ETF from Alpha Blue Capital and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year ABCS returned +14.62% while QQQ returned +21.77%. Year to date, ABCS is up 12.87% versus a gain of 17.95% for QQQ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.9% compared with 14.0% for ABCS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -20.5% for ABCS and -22.8% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.38. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ABCS charges 0.42% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $42 vs $18 annually, a gap of $24 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ABCS currently yields 1.11% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
7.8% of ABCS's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 2.6% of QQQ's money is in holdings ABCS also owns.
ABCS and QQQ share little of their money.
8 positions in common, counted across the 105 positions we hold weights for in ABCS and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 106 and 107.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 88 positions for QQQ that do not appear in our book for ABCS (95.0% of the fund), and 94 for ABCS that do not appear in QQQ (90.1%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ABCS | Weight in QQQ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| BKNGBooking Holdings, Inc. | 1.08% | 0.70% | 0.38% |
| ADBEAdobe Systems | 1.24% | 0.46% | 0.78% |
| GEHCGe Healthcare Technologies Inc | 1.38% | 0.14% | 1.24% |
| INTUIntuit, Inc. | 0.84% | 0.39% | 0.45% |
| PYPLPaypay Holdings, Inc. | 0.92% | 0.22% | 0.70% |
| KDPKeurig Dr Pepper Inc (kdp Us) | 0.91% | 0.18% | 0.73% |
| ABNBAirbnb Inc | 0.81% | 0.28% | 0.53% |
| FANGDiamondback Energy, Inc. | 0.60% | 0.23% | 0.37% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of ABCS and QQQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ABCS or QQQ?
ABCS has an expense ratio of 0.42% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $24 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ABCS or QQQ?
Over the past year ABCS returned +14.62% vs +21.77% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ABCS or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 16.9% annualized versus 14.0% for ABCS. Worst drawdown: ABCS -20.5% vs QQQ -22.8%.
Should I hold both ABCS and QQQ?
ABCS and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.38, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between ABCS and QQQ?
7.8% of ABCS's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 2.6% of QQQ's is in holdings ABCS also owns. They hold 8 positions in common, counted across the 105 positions we hold weights for in ABCS and 102 in QQQ.
Which pays a higher dividend, ABCS or QQQ?
ABCS yields 1.11% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so ABCS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than ABCS?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y and the full window. ABCS is less concentrated, with 39.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.