ABLD vs QQQ
Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 103 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ABLD | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.39% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $92M | $455.8B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.65% | 0.41% | |
| Holdings | 52 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +12.28% | +17.46% | |
| 1Y Return | +19.21% | +26.02% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +11.39% | +25.51% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.12% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.0% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -19.4% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Donoghue Forlines ETFs | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 13, 2021 | Mar 10, 1999 |
ABLD vs QQQ Performance
Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF (ABLD) is a ETF from Donoghue Forlines ETFs and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year ABLD returned +19.21% while QQQ returned +26.02%. Year to date, ABLD is up 12.28% versus a gain of 17.46% for QQQ.
Over three years, ABLD compounded at +11.39% per year against +25.51% for QQQ. Across the full 5-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.08% annualized vs +12.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 17.0% for ABLD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.4% for ABLD and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.48. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ABLD charges 0.39% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $18 annually, a gap of $21 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ABLD currently yields 3.65% against 0.41% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
ABLD and QQQ share 0 holdings out of 151 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ABLD or QQQ?
ABLD has an expense ratio of 0.39% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $21 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ABLD or QQQ?
Over the past year ABLD returned +19.21% vs +26.02% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), ABLD annualized +12.26% vs +13.08% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ABLD or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 17.0% for ABLD. Worst drawdown: ABLD -19.4% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both ABLD and QQQ?
ABLD and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.48, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between ABLD and QQQ?
ABLD and QQQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 151 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ABLD or QQQ?
ABLD yields 3.65% while QQQ yields 0.41%, so ABLD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.