ABLD vs IVV
Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, ABLD or IVV?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. ABLD is less concentrated, with 35.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ABLD | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.39% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $101M | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 3.37% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 51 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +10.92% | +12.39%Best |
| 1Y Return | +13.09% | +16.61%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +10.42% | +21.38%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.51% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.9% | 15.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -19.4%Best | -24.5% |
| $10,000 over 4.8 years | $17,001 | $17,706Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 35.7%Best | 37.8% |
| Fund Family | Donoghue Forlines ETFs | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Dec 13, 2021 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 14, 2021 to Sep 18, 2026 (4.8 years).
ABLD vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.8 years both funds cover.
ABLD vs IVV Performance
Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF (ABLD) is an ETF from Donoghue Forlines ETFs and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year ABLD returned +13.09% while IVV returned +16.61%. Year to date, ABLD is up 10.92% versus a gain of 12.39% for IVV.
Over three years, ABLD compounded at +10.42% per year against +21.38% for IVV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ABLD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.9% compared with 15.8% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.4% for ABLD and -24.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.71. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ABLD charges 0.39% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $3 annually, a gap of $36 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ABLD currently yields 3.37% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
16.4% of ABLD's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 0.5% of IVV's money is in holdings ABLD also owns.
ABLD and IVV share little of their money.
5 positions in common, counted across the 46 positions we hold weights for in ABLD and 490 in IVV, against full books of 51 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 477 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for ABLD (98.2% of the fund), and 28 for ABLD that do not appear in IVV (58.6%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of ABLD and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ABLD or IVV?
ABLD has an expense ratio of 0.39% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $36 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ABLD or IVV?
Over the past year ABLD returned +13.09% vs +16.61% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ABLD or IVV?
ABLD has been the more volatile fund at 16.9% annualized versus 15.8% for IVV. Worst drawdown: ABLD -19.4% vs IVV -24.5%.
Should I hold both ABLD and IVV?
ABLD and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.71, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between ABLD and IVV?
16.4% of ABLD's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 0.5% of IVV's is in holdings ABLD also owns. They hold 5 positions in common, counted across the 46 positions we hold weights for in ABLD and 490 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, ABLD or IVV?
ABLD yields 3.37% while IVV yields 1.06%, so ABLD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than ABLD?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. ABLD is less concentrated, with 35.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.