ABLD vs VYM
Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ABLD | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.39% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $92M | $79.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.65% | 2.86% | |
| Holdings | 52 | 568 | |
| YTD Return | +12.10% | +16.10% | |
| 1Y Return | +19.03% | +25.99% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +11.14% | +18.29% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.35% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.0% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -19.4% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Donoghue Forlines ETFs | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 13, 2021 | Nov 10, 2006 |
ABLD vs VYM Performance
Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF (ABLD) is a ETF from Donoghue Forlines ETFs and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ABLD returned +19.03% while VYM returned +25.99%. Year to date, ABLD is up 12.10% versus a gain of 16.10% for VYM.
Over three years, ABLD compounded at +11.14% per year against +18.29% for VYM. Across the full 5-year window we track, ABLD has the edge at +12.23% annualized vs +7.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ABLD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.0% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.4% for ABLD and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.90. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ABLD charges 0.39% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $4 annually, a gap of $35 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ABLD currently yields 3.65% against 2.86% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
ABLD and VYM share 11 holdings out of 595 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ABLD or VYM?
ABLD has an expense ratio of 0.39% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $35 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ABLD or VYM?
Over the past year ABLD returned +19.03% vs +25.99% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), ABLD annualized +12.23% vs +7.08% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ABLD or VYM?
ABLD has been the more volatile fund at 17.0% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: ABLD -19.4% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both ABLD and VYM?
ABLD and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.90, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between ABLD and VYM?
ABLD and VYM share 11 common holdings with a 1.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 595 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ABLD or VYM?
ABLD yields 3.65% while VYM yields 2.86%, so ABLD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.