ABLD vs VYM
Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, ABLD or VYM?
Each has led over a different period.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. ABLD led over the full window, VYM over 1Y and 3Y. VYM is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 35.7%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ABLD | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.39% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $101M | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 3.37% | 2.22% |
| Holdings | 51 | 613 |
| YTD Return | +10.92% | +11.35%Best |
| 1Y Return | +13.09% | +15.34%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +10.42% | +17.22%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.30% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.9% | 13.7%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -19.4% | -15.8%Best |
| $10,000 over 4.8 years | $17,001Best | $16,732 |
| Top 10 Weight | 35.7% | 26.1%Best |
| Fund Family | Donoghue Forlines ETFs | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Dec 13, 2021 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 14, 2021 to Sep 18, 2026 (4.8 years).
ABLD vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.8 years both funds cover.
ABLD vs VYM Performance
Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF (ABLD) is an ETF from Donoghue Forlines ETFs and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ABLD returned +13.09% while VYM returned +15.34%. Year to date, ABLD is up 10.92% versus a gain of 11.35% for VYM.
Over three years, ABLD compounded at +10.42% per year against +17.22% for VYM.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ABLD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.9% compared with 13.7% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.4% for ABLD and -15.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.89. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ABLD charges 0.39% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $4 annually, a gap of $35 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ABLD currently yields 3.37% against 2.22% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
24.0% of ABLD's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 1.0% of VYM's money is in holdings ABLD also owns.
ABLD and VYM share little of their money.
10 positions in common, counted across the 46 positions we hold weights for in ABLD and 557 in VYM, against full books of 51 and 613.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 519 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for ABLD (96.1% of the fund), and 24 for ABLD that do not appear in VYM (52.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ABLD | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| APAApa Corp | 4.26% | 0.05% | 4.21% |
| NEMNewmont Corp Common | 3.42% | 0.41% | 3.01% |
| ADMArcher-Daniels-Midland Co. | 3.54% | 0.15% | 3.39% |
| AMAntero Midstream Corporationam | 3.07% | 0.03% | 3.04% |
| AOSAo Smith Corp. | 2.22% | 0.03% | 2.19% |
| DVNDevon Energy Corporation | 1.93% | 0.21% | 1.72% |
| OCOwens Corning | 1.81% | 0.04% | 1.77% |
| CALMCal-maine Foods Inc | 1.40% | 0.02% | 1.38% |
| STNG:MHScorpio Tankers Inc. Common Stock | 1.33% | 0.01% | 1.32% |
| CRCCalifornia Resources Corp Common Stock | 1.03% | 0.02% | 1.01% |
24.0% of ABLD is already inside VYM.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ABLD or VYM?
ABLD has an expense ratio of 0.39% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $35 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ABLD or VYM?
Over the past year ABLD returned +13.09% vs +15.34% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ABLD or VYM?
ABLD has been the more volatile fund at 16.9% annualized versus 13.7% for VYM. Worst drawdown: ABLD -19.4% vs VYM -15.8%.
Should I hold both ABLD and VYM?
ABLD and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.89, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between ABLD and VYM?
24.0% of ABLD's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 1.0% of VYM's is in holdings ABLD also owns. They hold 10 positions in common, counted across the 46 positions we hold weights for in ABLD and 557 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, ABLD or VYM?
ABLD yields 3.37% while VYM yields 2.22%, so ABLD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than ABLD?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. ABLD led over the full window, VYM over 1Y and 3Y. VYM is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 35.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.