ABLD vs SCHD
Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Quick Verdict
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD delivered stronger 1-year returns. SCHD offers more diversification with 100 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ABLD | SCHD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.39% | 0.06% | |
| AUM | $92M | $103.7B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.65% | 3.31% | |
| Holdings | 52 | 104 | |
| YTD Return | +12.28% | +25.62% | |
| 1Y Return | +19.21% | +32.62% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +11.39% | +15.58% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.63% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.0% | 13.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -19.4% | -33.4% | |
| Fund Family | Donoghue Forlines ETFs | Charles Schwab Asset Management | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 13, 2021 | Oct 20, 2011 |
ABLD vs SCHD Performance
Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF (ABLD) is a ETF from Donoghue Forlines ETFs and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is a ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year ABLD returned +19.21% while SCHD returned +32.62%. Year to date, ABLD is up 12.28% versus a gain of 25.62% for SCHD.
Over three years, ABLD compounded at +11.39% per year against +15.58% for SCHD. Across the full 5-year window we track, ABLD has the edge at +12.26% annualized vs +11.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ABLD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.0% compared with 13.6% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.4% for ABLD and -33.4% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.88. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ABLD charges 0.39% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $6 annually, a gap of $33 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ABLD currently yields 3.65% against 3.31% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
ABLD and SCHD share 3 holdings out of 145 unique holdings combined, representing a 2.7% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ABLD or SCHD?
ABLD has an expense ratio of 0.39% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $33 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ABLD or SCHD?
Over the past year ABLD returned +19.21% vs +32.62% for SCHD, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), ABLD annualized +12.26% vs +11.47% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ABLD or SCHD?
ABLD has been the more volatile fund at 17.0% annualized versus 13.6% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: ABLD -19.4% vs SCHD -33.4%.
Should I hold both ABLD and SCHD?
ABLD and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.88, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between ABLD and SCHD?
ABLD and SCHD share 3 common holdings with a 2.7% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 145 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ABLD or SCHD?
ABLD yields 3.65% while SCHD yields 3.31%, so ABLD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.