ABLD vs VTI
Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ABLD | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.39% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $92M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.65% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 52 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +12.28% | +13.87% | |
| 1Y Return | +19.21% | +23.31% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +11.39% | +21.17% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.23% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.0% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -19.4% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Donoghue Forlines ETFs | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 13, 2021 | May 24, 2001 |
ABLD vs VTI Performance
Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF (ABLD) is a ETF from Donoghue Forlines ETFs and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ABLD returned +19.21% while VTI returned +23.31%. Year to date, ABLD is up 12.28% versus a gain of 13.87% for VTI.
Over three years, ABLD compounded at +11.39% per year against +21.17% for VTI. Across the full 5-year window we track, ABLD has the edge at +12.26% annualized vs +8.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ABLD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.0% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.4% for ABLD and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.72. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ABLD charges 0.39% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $3 annually, a gap of $36 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ABLD currently yields 3.65% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
ABLD and VTI share 18 holdings out of 2813 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.4% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ABLD or VTI?
ABLD has an expense ratio of 0.39% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $36 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ABLD or VTI?
Over the past year ABLD returned +19.21% vs +23.31% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), ABLD annualized +12.26% vs +8.13% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ABLD or VTI?
ABLD has been the more volatile fund at 17.0% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: ABLD -19.4% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both ABLD and VTI?
ABLD and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.72, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between ABLD and VTI?
ABLD and VTI share 18 common holdings with a 0.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2813 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ABLD or VTI?
ABLD yields 3.65% while VTI yields 1.07%, so ABLD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.