ABLD vs VTI
Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, ABLD or VTI?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 35.7%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ABLD | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.39% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $101M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 3.37% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 51 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +10.64% | +14.00%Best |
| 1Y Return | +13.94% | +16.88%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +11.06% | +22.75%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.68% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.9% | 16.0%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -19.4%Best | -25.4% |
| $10,000 over 4.8 years | $16,942 | $17,362Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 35.7% | 33.3%Best |
| Fund Family | Donoghue Forlines ETFs | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Dec 13, 2021 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 14, 2021 to Sep 21, 2026 (4.8 years).
ABLD vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.8 years both funds cover.
ABLD vs VTI Performance
Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF (ABLD) is an ETF from Donoghue Forlines ETFs and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ABLD returned +13.94% while VTI returned +16.88%. Year to date, ABLD is up 10.64% versus a gain of 14.00% for VTI.
Over three years, ABLD compounded at +11.06% per year against +22.75% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ABLD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.9% compared with 16.0% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.4% for ABLD and -25.4% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.72. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ABLD charges 0.39% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $3 annually, a gap of $36 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ABLD currently yields 3.37% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
45.8% of ABLD's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 0.6% of VTI's money is in holdings ABLD also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
22 positions in common, counted across the 46 positions we hold weights for in ABLD and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 51 and 3,543.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,129 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for ABLD (96.9% of the fund), and 11 for ABLD that do not appear in VTI (29.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ABLD | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| APAApa Corp | 4.26% | 0.02% | 4.24% |
| ADMArcher-Daniels-Midland Co. | 3.54% | 0.05% | 3.49% |
| NEMNewmont Corp Common | 3.42% | 0.14% | 3.28% |
| SPGSimon Property Group Inc | 3.30% | 0.10% | 3.20% |
| AMAntero Midstream Corporationam | 3.07% | 0.01% | 3.06% |
| CSLCsl Ltd. - Adr | 2.59% | 0.02% | 2.57% |
| SUISun Communities Inc. | 2.49% | 0.02% | 2.47% |
| AOSAo Smith Corp. | 2.22% | 0.01% | 2.21% |
| DVNDevon Energy Corporation | 1.93% | 0.07% | 1.86% |
| OCOwens Corning | 1.81% | 0.02% | 1.79% |
45.8% of ABLD is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ABLD or VTI?
ABLD has an expense ratio of 0.39% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $36 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ABLD or VTI?
Over the past year ABLD returned +13.94% vs +16.88% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ABLD or VTI?
ABLD has been the more volatile fund at 16.9% annualized versus 16.0% for VTI. Worst drawdown: ABLD -19.4% vs VTI -25.4%.
Should I hold both ABLD and VTI?
ABLD and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.72, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between ABLD and VTI?
45.8% of ABLD's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 0.6% of VTI's is in holdings ABLD also owns. They hold 22 positions in common, counted across the 46 positions we hold weights for in ABLD and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, ABLD or VTI?
ABLD yields 3.37% while VTI yields 1.03%, so ABLD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than ABLD?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 35.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.