ABLG vs IVV
Abacus FCF International Leaders ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, ABLG or IVV?
IVV has been ahead.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. ABLG is less concentrated, with 35.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ABLG | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.54% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $15M | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.40% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 50 | 508 |
| YTD Return | -0.19% | +14.14%Best |
| 1Y Return | +2.52% | +17.30%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +8.10% | +23.04%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +0.67% | +13.63%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.1% | 15.9%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -36.0% | -33.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $10,340 | $18,944Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 35.4%Best | 37.8% |
| Fund Family | FCF Advisors | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jun 27, 2017 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 28, 2017 to Sep 22, 2026 (9.2 years).
ABLG vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 9.2 years both funds cover.
ABLG vs IVV Performance
Abacus FCF International Leaders ETF (ABLG) is an ETF from FCF Advisors and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year ABLG returned +2.52% while IVV returned +17.30%. Year to date, ABLG is down 0.19% versus a gain of 14.14% for IVV.
Over three years, ABLG compounded at +8.10% per year against +23.04% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +0.67% and +13.63% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +14.29% annualized vs +4.46%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ABLG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.1% compared with 15.9% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -36.0% for ABLG and -33.9% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.87. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ABLG charges 0.54% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $54 vs $3 annually, a gap of $51 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ABLG currently yields 2.40% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
4.4% of ABLG's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 0.2% of IVV's money is in holdings ABLG also owns.
ABLG and IVV share little of their money.
2 positions in common, counted across the 48 positions we hold weights for in ABLG and 490 in IVV, against full books of 50 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 480 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for ABLG (98.4% of the fund), and 11 for ABLG that do not appear in IVV (18.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of ABLG and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ABLG or IVV?
ABLG has an expense ratio of 0.54% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $51 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ABLG or IVV?
Over the past year ABLG returned +2.52% vs +17.30% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), ABLG annualized +4.46% vs +14.29% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ABLG or IVV?
ABLG has been the more volatile fund at 16.1% annualized versus 15.9% for IVV. Worst drawdown: ABLG -36.0% vs IVV -33.9%.
Should I hold both ABLG and IVV?
ABLG and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.87, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between ABLG and IVV?
4.4% of ABLG's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 0.2% of IVV's is in holdings ABLG also owns. They hold 2 positions in common, counted across the 48 positions we hold weights for in ABLG and 490 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, ABLG or IVV?
ABLG yields 2.40% while IVV yields 1.06%, so ABLG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than ABLG?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. ABLG is less concentrated, with 35.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.