ABLG vs QQQ
Abacus FCF International Leaders ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 103 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ABLG | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.54% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $16M | $455.8B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.31% | 0.41% | |
| Holdings | 52 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +0.36% | +19.68% | |
| 1Y Return | +8.13% | +26.75% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +7.65% | +26.25% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +0.63% | +15.39% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.2% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -36.0% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | FCF Advisors | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 27, 2017 | Mar 10, 1999 |
ABLG vs QQQ Performance
Abacus FCF International Leaders ETF (ABLG) is a ETF from FCF Advisors and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year ABLG returned +8.13% while QQQ returned +26.75%. Year to date, ABLG is up 0.36% versus a gain of 19.68% for QQQ.
Over three years, ABLG compounded at +7.65% per year against +26.25% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +0.63% and +15.39% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.15% annualized vs +4.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 16.2% for ABLG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -36.0% for ABLG and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.79. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ABLG charges 0.54% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $54 vs $18 annually, a gap of $36 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ABLG currently yields 2.31% against 0.41% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
ABLG and QQQ share 2 holdings out of 147 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.9% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ABLG or QQQ?
ABLG has an expense ratio of 0.54% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $36 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ABLG or QQQ?
Over the past year ABLG returned +8.13% vs +26.75% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), ABLG annualized +4.57% vs +13.15% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ABLG or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 16.2% for ABLG. Worst drawdown: ABLG -36.0% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both ABLG and QQQ?
ABLG and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.79, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between ABLG and QQQ?
ABLG and QQQ share 2 common holdings with a 0.9% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 147 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ABLG or QQQ?
ABLG yields 2.31% while QQQ yields 0.41%, so ABLG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.