ABLG vs VYM
Abacus FCF International Leaders ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, ABLG or VYM?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 35.4%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ABLG | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.54% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $15M | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.40% | 2.22% |
| Holdings | 50 | 613 |
| YTD Return | -0.63% | +11.47%Best |
| 1Y Return | +2.07% | +15.94%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +7.78% | +18.03%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +0.71% | +12.35%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.1% | 14.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -36.0% | -35.7%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $10,360 | $17,901Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 35.4% | 26.1%Best |
| Fund Family | FCF Advisors | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Jun 27, 2017 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 28, 2017 to Sep 21, 2026 (9.2 years).
ABLG vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 9.2 years both funds cover.
ABLG vs VYM Performance
Abacus FCF International Leaders ETF (ABLG) is an ETF from FCF Advisors and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ABLG returned +2.07% while VYM returned +15.94%. Year to date, ABLG is down 0.63% versus a gain of 11.47% for VYM.
Over three years, ABLG compounded at +7.78% per year against +18.03% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +0.71% and +12.35% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +9.85% annualized vs +4.41%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ABLG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.1% compared with 14.8% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -36.0% for ABLG and -35.7% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.80. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ABLG charges 0.54% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $54 vs $4 annually, a gap of $50 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ABLG currently yields 2.40% against 2.22% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
2.0% of ABLG's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 0.2% of VYM's money is in holdings ABLG also owns.
ABLG and VYM share little of their money.
1 positions in common, counted across the 48 positions we hold weights for in ABLG and 557 in VYM, against full books of 50 and 613.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 527 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for ABLG (96.8% of the fund), and 12 for ABLG that do not appear in VYM (21.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ABLG | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| TELTE Connectivity PLC Common Stock | 1.96% | 0.24% | 1.72% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of ABLG and VYM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ABLG or VYM?
ABLG has an expense ratio of 0.54% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $50 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ABLG or VYM?
Over the past year ABLG returned +2.07% vs +15.94% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), ABLG annualized +4.41% vs +9.85% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ABLG or VYM?
ABLG has been the more volatile fund at 16.1% annualized versus 14.8% for VYM. Worst drawdown: ABLG -36.0% vs VYM -35.7%.
Should I hold both ABLG and VYM?
ABLG and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.80, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between ABLG and VYM?
2.0% of ABLG's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 0.2% of VYM's is in holdings ABLG also owns. They hold 1 positions in common, counted across the 48 positions we hold weights for in ABLG and 557 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, ABLG or VYM?
ABLG yields 2.40% while VYM yields 2.22%, so ABLG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than ABLG?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 35.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.