ABLG vs VYM
Abacus FCF International Leaders ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ABLG | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.54% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $16M | $79.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.31% | 2.86% | |
| Holdings | 52 | 568 | |
| YTD Return | -0.16% | +16.16% | |
| 1Y Return | +10.67% | +26.05% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +7.48% | +18.43% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +0.61% | +12.21% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.2% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -36.0% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | FCF Advisors | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 27, 2017 | Nov 10, 2006 |
ABLG vs VYM Performance
Abacus FCF International Leaders ETF (ABLG) is a ETF from FCF Advisors and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ABLG returned +10.67% while VYM returned +26.05%. Year to date, ABLG is down 0.16% versus a gain of 16.16% for VYM.
Over three years, ABLG compounded at +7.48% per year against +18.43% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +0.61% and +12.21% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +7.09% annualized vs +4.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ABLG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.2% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -36.0% for ABLG and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.80. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ABLG charges 0.54% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $54 vs $4 annually, a gap of $50 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ABLG currently yields 2.31% against 2.86% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
ABLG and VYM share 2 holdings out of 602 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.4% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ABLG or VYM?
ABLG has an expense ratio of 0.54% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $50 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ABLG or VYM?
Over the past year ABLG returned +10.67% vs +26.05% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), ABLG annualized +4.52% vs +7.09% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ABLG or VYM?
ABLG has been the more volatile fund at 16.2% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: ABLG -36.0% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both ABLG and VYM?
ABLG and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.80, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between ABLG and VYM?
ABLG and VYM share 2 common holdings with a 0.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 602 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ABLG or VYM?
ABLG yields 2.31% while VYM yields 2.86%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.