ABLG vs VOO
Abacus FCF International Leaders ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ABLG | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.54% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $16M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.31% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 52 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +0.43% | +13.72% | |
| 1Y Return | +9.25% | +21.63% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +7.69% | +21.55% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +0.75% | +13.26% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.2% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -36.0% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | FCF Advisors | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 27, 2017 | Sep 7, 2010 |
ABLG vs VOO Performance
Abacus FCF International Leaders ETF (ABLG) is a ETF from FCF Advisors and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ABLG returned +9.25% while VOO returned +21.63%. Year to date, ABLG is up 0.43% versus a gain of 13.72% for VOO.
Over three years, ABLG compounded at +7.69% per year against +21.55% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +0.75% and +13.26% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.56% annualized vs +4.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ABLG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.2% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -36.0% for ABLG and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.87. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ABLG charges 0.54% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $54 vs $3 annually, a gap of $51 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ABLG currently yields 2.31% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
ABLG and VOO share 2 holdings out of 549 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.2% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ABLG or VOO?
ABLG has an expense ratio of 0.54% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $51 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ABLG or VOO?
Over the past year ABLG returned +9.25% vs +21.63% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), ABLG annualized +4.58% vs +13.56% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ABLG or VOO?
ABLG has been the more volatile fund at 16.2% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: ABLG -36.0% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both ABLG and VOO?
ABLG and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.87, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between ABLG and VOO?
ABLG and VOO share 2 common holdings with a 0.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 549 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ABLG or VOO?
ABLG yields 2.31% while VOO yields 1.09%, so ABLG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.