ABLG vs SPY
Abacus FCF International Leaders ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust
Quick Verdict
SPY has a lower expense ratio. SPY delivered stronger 1-year returns. SPY offers more diversification with 503 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ABLG | SPY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.54% | 0.09% | |
| AUM | $16M | $789.1B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.31% | 1.01% | |
| Holdings | 52 | 505 | |
| YTD Return | +0.43% | +13.68% | |
| 1Y Return | +9.25% | +21.53% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +7.69% | +21.44% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +0.75% | +13.18% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.2% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -36.0% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | FCF Advisors | State Street Investment Management | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 27, 2017 | Jan 22, 1993 |
ABLG vs SPY Performance
Abacus FCF International Leaders ETF (ABLG) is a ETF from FCF Advisors and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) is a ETF from State Street Investment Management. Over the past year ABLG returned +9.25% while SPY returned +21.53%. Year to date, ABLG is up 0.43% versus a gain of 13.68% for SPY.
Over three years, ABLG compounded at +7.69% per year against +21.44% for SPY; over five years the annualized figures are +0.75% and +13.18% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, SPY has the edge at +8.85% annualized vs +4.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ABLG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.2% compared with 15.3% for SPY. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -36.0% for ABLG and -56.5% for SPY. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.87. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ABLG charges 0.54% per year while SPY charges 0.09%. On a $10,000 position that is $54 vs $9 annually, a gap of $45 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ABLG currently yields 2.31% against 1.01% for SPY.
Holdings Overlap
ABLG and SPY share 3 holdings out of 546 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.3% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ABLG or SPY?
ABLG has an expense ratio of 0.54% while SPY charges 0.09%. SPY is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $45 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ABLG or SPY?
Over the past year ABLG returned +9.25% vs +21.53% for SPY, so SPY leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), ABLG annualized +4.58% vs +8.85% for SPY. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ABLG or SPY?
ABLG has been the more volatile fund at 16.2% annualized versus 15.3% for SPY. Worst drawdown: ABLG -36.0% vs SPY -56.5%.
Should I hold both ABLG and SPY?
ABLG and SPY have a monthly-return correlation of 0.87, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between ABLG and SPY?
ABLG and SPY share 3 common holdings with a 0.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 546 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ABLG or SPY?
ABLG yields 2.31% while SPY yields 1.01%, so ABLG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.