ACIG vs EFG
Hartford Alpha Capture International Growth ETF vs iShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF
Which is better, ACIG or EFG?
EFG costs less.
EFG has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ACIG | EFG |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.56% | 0.34%Best |
| AUM | $15M | $14.8B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 2.32% |
| Holdings | 84 | 742 |
| YTD Return | -0.78% | +4.83%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +5.63% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.97% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +3.09% |
| Fund Family | Hartford Funds | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Sep 29, 2026 | Aug 1, 2005 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
ACIG vs EFG growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
ACIG vs EFG Performance
Hartford Alpha Capture International Growth ETF (ACIG) is an ETF from Hartford Funds and iShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF (EFG) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Year to date, ACIG is down 0.78% versus a gain of 4.83% for EFG.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ACIG charges 0.56% per year while EFG charges 0.34%. On a $10,000 position that is $56 vs $34 annually, a gap of $22 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ACIG currently yields 0.00% against 2.32% for EFG.
Holdings Overlap
At least 36.3% of EFG's money is in holdings ACIG also owns.
Stated as a floor: for ACIG, our book for it covers 78.4% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
51 positions in common, counted across the 84 positions we hold weights for in ACIG and 349 in EFG, against full books of 84 and 742.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ACIG | Weight in EFG | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AZN:LNAstraZeneca PLC | 2.99% | 2.33% | 0.66% |
| SAP:SGSap Se | 2.56% | 2.11% | 0.45% |
| 6857:JPAdvantest Corp | 2.35% | 1.77% | 0.58% |
| SCHN:PASchneider Electric Se | 2.26% | 1.54% | 0.72% |
| CBA:AUCommonwealth Bank Of Australia | 1.72% | 1.68% | 0.04% |
| 6861:JPKeyence Corp | 2.42% | 0.91% | 1.51% |
| 6098:JPRecruit Holdings Co. Ltd. Com Stk | 1.80% | 1.45% | 0.35% |
| RR:LNRolls-Royce Holdings PLC Ord Gbp0.20 | 1.72% | 1.42% | 0.30% |
| SAF:PASafran Sa | 1.73% | 1.15% | 0.58% |
| 6758:JPSony Corp | 1.12% | 1.34% | 0.22% |
36.3% of EFG is already inside ACIG.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ACIG or EFG?
ACIG has an expense ratio of 0.56% while EFG charges 0.34%. EFG is the cheaper option, by $22 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between ACIG and EFG?
At least 36.3% of EFG's money is in holdings ACIG also owns. Our book for ACIG is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 51 positions in common, counted across the 84 positions we hold weights for in ACIG and 349 in EFG.
Which pays a higher dividend, ACIG or EFG?
ACIG yields 0.00% while EFG yields 2.32%, so EFG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is EFG better than ACIG?
EFG has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.