ACMG vs IWP
American Century Mid Cap Growth Insights ETF vs iShares Russell Midcap Growth ETF
Which is better, ACMG or IWP?
ACMG has been ahead.
IWP has a lower expense ratio. ACMG led over 1Y. IWP is less concentrated, with 22.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 52.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ACMG | IWP |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.39% | 0.23%Best |
| AUM | $93M | $18.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.11% | 0.39% |
| Holdings | 35 | 551 |
| YTD Return | -8.40% | -6.25%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | -5.35% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.53% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +1.69% |
| Top 10 Weight | 52.3% | 22.2%Best |
| Fund Family | American Century Investments | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Growth | Mid Cap Growth |
| Inception | Jul 13, 2020 | Jul 17, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
ACMG vs IWP growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
ACMG vs IWP Performance
American Century Mid Cap Growth Insights ETF (ACMG) is an ETF from American Century Investments and iShares Russell Midcap Growth ETF (IWP) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Year to date, ACMG is down 8.40% versus a loss of 6.25% for IWP.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ACMG charges 0.39% per year while IWP charges 0.23%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $23 annually, a gap of $16 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ACMG currently yields 0.11% against 0.39% for IWP.
Holdings Overlap
46.9% of ACMG's money is in holdings IWP also owns. 16.4% of IWP's money is in holdings ACMG also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
17 positions in common, counted across the 34 positions we hold weights for in ACMG and 271 in IWP, against full books of 35 and 551.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 236 positions for IWP that do not appear in our book for ACMG (79.9% of the fund), and 14 for ACMG that do not appear in IWP (46.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ACMG | Weight in IWP | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NETCloudflare Inc (180 Day Lockup) | 7.80% | 3.05% | 4.75% |
| TRGPTarga Resources Corp Preferred | 4.68% | 1.82% | 2.86% |
| CMGChipotle Mexican Grill Inc. Class A | 4.58% | 1.13% | 3.45% |
| MTSIMacom Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. | 4.78% | 0.58% | 4.20% |
| VSTVistra Energy Corp. | 3.17% | 1.50% | 1.67% |
| ALNYAlnylam Pharmaceuticals Inc. | 3.14% | 0.88% | 2.26% |
| NTRANatera Inc | 2.06% | 1.58% | 0.48% |
| CPNGCoupang LLC | 3.09% | 0.53% | 2.56% |
| IDXXIdexx Laboratories Inc. | 2.24% | 1.03% | 1.21% |
| RDDTReddit Inc Series C Pc Pp | 2.62% | 0.60% | 2.02% |
46.9% of ACMG is already inside IWP.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ACMG or IWP?
ACMG has an expense ratio of 0.39% while IWP charges 0.23%. IWP is the cheaper option, by $16 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between ACMG and IWP?
46.9% of ACMG's money is in holdings IWP also owns. 16.4% of IWP's is in holdings ACMG also owns. They hold 17 positions in common, counted across the 34 positions we hold weights for in ACMG and 271 in IWP.
Which pays a higher dividend, ACMG or IWP?
ACMG yields 0.11% while IWP yields 0.39%, so IWP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IWP better than ACMG?
IWP has a lower expense ratio. ACMG led over 1Y. IWP is less concentrated, with 22.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 52.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.