ACOM vs VTI
Harbor Active Commodity ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ACOM | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.93% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $29M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | - | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 0 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +13.99% | +14.82% | |
| 1Y Return | - | +22.43% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.93% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.34% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | - | 15.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -4.3% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Harbor Funds | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Commodity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 16, 2026 | May 24, 2001 |
ACOM vs VTI Performance
Harbor Active Commodity ETF (ACOM) is a ETF from Harbor Funds and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, ACOM is up 13.99% versus a gain of 14.82% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -4.3% for ACOM and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ACOM charges 0.93% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $93 vs $3 annually, a gap of $90 per year that compounds over a long holding period.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ACOM or VTI?
ACOM has an expense ratio of 0.93% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $90 per year of difference.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.