ACOM vs QQQ
Harbor Active Commodity ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ACOM | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.93% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $29M | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | - | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 0 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +17.26% | +17.07% | |
| 1Y Return | - | +26.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +26.08% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.18% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | - | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -4.3% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Harbor Funds | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Commodity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 16, 2026 | Mar 10, 1999 |
ACOM vs QQQ Performance
Harbor Active Commodity ETF (ACOM) is a ETF from Harbor Funds and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Year to date, ACOM is up 17.26% versus a gain of 17.07% for QQQ.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -4.3% for ACOM and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ACOM charges 0.93% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $93 vs $18 annually, a gap of $75 per year that compounds over a long holding period.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ACOM or QQQ?
ACOM has an expense ratio of 0.93% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $75 per year of difference.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.