ACOM vs VOO
Harbor Active Commodity ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ACOM | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.93% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $29M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | - | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 0 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +13.99% | +14.27% | |
| 1Y Return | - | +21.79% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.19% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | - | 14.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -4.3% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Harbor Funds | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Commodity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 16, 2026 | Sep 7, 2010 |
ACOM vs VOO Performance
Harbor Active Commodity ETF (ACOM) is a ETF from Harbor Funds and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, ACOM is up 13.99% versus a gain of 14.27% for VOO.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -4.3% for ACOM and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ACOM charges 0.93% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $93 vs $3 annually, a gap of $90 per year that compounds over a long holding period.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ACOM or VOO?
ACOM has an expense ratio of 0.93% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $90 per year of difference.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.