ACVT vs IVV
Advent Convertible Bond ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ACVT | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $32M | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 58 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +6.75% | +13.43% | |
| 1Y Return | +9.29% | +22.61% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.47% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.26% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 5.7% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -5.1% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Advent Capital Management | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 30, 2025 | May 15, 2000 |
ACVT vs IVV Performance
Advent Convertible Bond ETF (ACVT) is a ETF from Advent Capital Management and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year ACVT returned +9.29% while IVV returned +22.61%. Year to date, ACVT is up 6.75% versus a gain of 13.43% for IVV.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 5.7% for ACVT. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -5.1% for ACVT and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.93. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ACVT charges 0.65% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $3 annually, a gap of $62 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ACVT currently yields 0.00% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
ACVT and IVV share 0 holdings out of 542 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ACVT or IVV?
ACVT has an expense ratio of 0.65% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $62 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ACVT or IVV?
Over the past year ACVT returned +9.29% vs +22.61% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), ACVT annualized +10.92% vs +7.03% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ACVT or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 5.7% for ACVT. Worst drawdown: ACVT -5.1% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both ACVT and IVV?
ACVT and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.93, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between ACVT and IVV?
ACVT and IVV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 542 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ACVT or IVV?
ACVT yields 0.00% while IVV yields 1.09%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.