ACVT vs VTI
Advent Convertible Bond ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ACVT | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $32M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 58 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +7.15% | +14.96% | |
| 1Y Return | +8.35% | +22.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.51% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 5.7% | 15.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -5.1% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Advent Capital Management | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 30, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
ACVT vs VTI Performance
Advent Convertible Bond ETF (ACVT) is a ETF from Advent Capital Management and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ACVT returned +8.35% while VTI returned +22.39%. Year to date, ACVT is up 7.15% versus a gain of 14.96% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.4% compared with 5.7% for ACVT. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -5.1% for ACVT and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.93. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ACVT charges 0.65% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $3 annually, a gap of $62 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ACVT currently yields 0.00% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
ACVT and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2820 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ACVT or VTI?
ACVT has an expense ratio of 0.65% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $62 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ACVT or VTI?
Over the past year ACVT returned +8.35% vs +22.39% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), ACVT annualized +11.19% vs +8.16% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ACVT or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.4% annualized versus 5.7% for ACVT. Worst drawdown: ACVT -5.1% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both ACVT and VTI?
ACVT and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.93, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between ACVT and VTI?
ACVT and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2820 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ACVT or VTI?
ACVT yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.