ACVT vs VYM
Advent Convertible Bond ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ACVT | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $32M | $79.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 2.86% | |
| Holdings | 58 | 568 | |
| YTD Return | +6.88% | +15.80% | |
| 1Y Return | +9.21% | +26.12% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +18.25% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.51% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 5.7% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -5.1% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Advent Capital Management | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 30, 2025 | Nov 10, 2006 |
ACVT vs VYM Performance
Advent Convertible Bond ETF (ACVT) is a ETF from Advent Capital Management and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ACVT returned +9.21% while VYM returned +26.12%. Year to date, ACVT is up 6.88% versus a gain of 15.80% for VYM.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VYM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.6% compared with 5.7% for ACVT. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -5.1% for ACVT and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.66. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ACVT charges 0.65% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $4 annually, a gap of $61 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ACVT currently yields 0.00% against 2.86% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
ACVT and VYM share 0 holdings out of 595 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ACVT or VYM?
ACVT has an expense ratio of 0.65% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $61 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ACVT or VYM?
Over the past year ACVT returned +9.21% vs +26.12% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), ACVT annualized +11.12% vs +7.07% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ACVT or VYM?
VYM has been the more volatile fund at 14.6% annualized versus 5.7% for ACVT. Worst drawdown: ACVT -5.1% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both ACVT and VYM?
ACVT and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.66, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between ACVT and VYM?
ACVT and VYM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 595 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ACVT or VYM?
ACVT yields 0.00% while VYM yields 2.86%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.