ADDS vs IVV
Hedgeye Index Adds ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, ADDS or IVV?
IVV costs less.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 73.4%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ADDS | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.70% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $7M | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 40 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +3.23% | +13.23%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +17.38% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.67% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.13% |
| Top 10 Weight | 73.4% | 37.8%Best |
| Fund Family | Hedgeye Asset Management | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 27, 2026 | May 15, 2000 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
ADDS vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
ADDS vs IVV Performance
Hedgeye Index Adds ETF (ADDS) is an ETF from Hedgeye Asset Management and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Year to date, ADDS is up 3.23% versus a gain of 13.23% for IVV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ADDS charges 0.70% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $70 vs $3 annually, a gap of $67 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ADDS currently yields 0.00% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 36 holdings in ADDS and 490 in IVV, totalling 98.4% and 99.3% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 36 positions we hold weights for in ADDS and 490 in IVV, against full books of 40 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 482 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for ADDS (98.6% of the fund), and 32 for ADDS that do not appear in IVV (96.6%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of ADDS and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ADDS or IVV?
ADDS has an expense ratio of 0.70% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $67 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, ADDS or IVV?
ADDS yields 0.00% while IVV yields 1.06%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than ADDS?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 73.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.