ADPV vs ZIG
Adaptiv Select ETF vs The Acquirers Fund ETF
Which is better, ADPV or ZIG?
Each has led over a different period.
ZIG has a lower expense ratio. ADPV led over 3Y and the full window, ZIG over 1Y. ZIG is less concentrated, with 34.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 45.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ADPV | ZIG |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.00% | 0.75%Best |
| AUM | $176M | $31M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.69% | 1.84% |
| Holdings | 28 | 97 |
| YTD Return | -0.05% | +8.11%Best |
| 1Y Return | -2.98% | +10.31%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.44%Best | +10.81% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +8.07% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.8%Best | 19.1% |
| Max Drawdown | -22.3%Best | -29.8% |
| $10,000 over 3.9 years | $17,666Best | $16,790 |
| Top 10 Weight | 45.5% | 34.5%Best |
| Fund Family | Adaptive ETFs | Acquirers Funds, LLC |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 4, 2022 | May 14, 2019 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 4, 2022 to Oct 15, 2026 (3.9 years).
ADPV vs ZIG growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.9 years both funds cover.
ADPV vs ZIG Performance
Adaptiv Select ETF (ADPV) is an ETF from Adaptive ETFs and The Acquirers Fund ETF (ZIG) is an ETF from Acquirers Funds, LLC. Over the past year ADPV returned -2.98% while ZIG returned +10.31%. Year to date, ADPV is down 0.05% versus a gain of 8.11% for ZIG.
Over three years, ADPV compounded at +22.44% per year against +10.81% for ZIG. Across the full 4-year window we track, ADPV has the edge at +15.71% annualized vs +14.21%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ZIG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.1% compared with 18.8% for ADPV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -22.3% for ADPV and -29.8% for ZIG. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.63. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ADPV charges 1.00% per year while ZIG charges 0.75%. On a $10,000 position that is $100 vs $75 annually, a gap of $25 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ADPV currently yields 0.69% against 1.84% for ZIG.
Holdings Overlap
5.6% of ADPV's money is in holdings ZIG also owns. 3.4% of ZIG's money is in holdings ADPV also owns.
ADPV and ZIG share little of their money.
2 positions in common, counted across the 26 positions we hold weights for in ADPV and 32 in ZIG, against full books of 28 and 97.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 30 positions for ZIG that do not appear in our book for ADPV (96.6% of the fund), and 20 for ADPV that do not appear in ZIG (79.1%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of ADPV and ZIG you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ADPV or ZIG?
ADPV has an expense ratio of 1.00% while ZIG charges 0.75%. ZIG is the cheaper option, by $25 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ADPV or ZIG?
Over the past year ADPV returned -2.98% vs +10.31% for ZIG, so ZIG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), ADPV annualized +15.71% vs +14.21% for ZIG. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ADPV or ZIG?
ZIG has been the more volatile fund at 19.1% annualized versus 18.8% for ADPV. Worst drawdown: ADPV -22.3% vs ZIG -29.8%.
Should I hold both ADPV and ZIG?
ADPV and ZIG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.63, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between ADPV and ZIG?
5.6% of ADPV's money is in holdings ZIG also owns. 3.4% of ZIG's is in holdings ADPV also owns. They hold 2 positions in common, counted across the 26 positions we hold weights for in ADPV and 32 in ZIG.
Which pays a higher dividend, ADPV or ZIG?
ADPV yields 0.69% while ZIG yields 1.84%, so ZIG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is ZIG better than ADPV?
ZIG has a lower expense ratio. ADPV led over 3Y and the full window, ZIG over 1Y. ZIG is less concentrated, with 34.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 45.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.