AEMC vs VYM

AEMC vs VYM

Which is better, AEMC or VYM?

Mid Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.

VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 27.7%.

Lower Fees: VYMLess Concentrated: VYM

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricAEMCVYM
Expense Ratio0.35%0.04%Best
AUM-$81.6B
Dividend Yield0.00%2.22%
Holdings99613
YTD Return-2.17%+13.08%Best
1Y Return-+17.46%
3Y Return (annualized)-+17.73%
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.22%
Top 10 Weight27.7%26.1%Best
Fund FamilyHarbor FundsVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleMid Cap BlendLarge Cap Value
InceptionAug 26, 2026Nov 10, 2006

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

AEMC vs VYM growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

AEMC vs VYM Performance

Harbor AlphaEdge Mid Cap Core ETF (AEMC) is an ETF from Harbor Funds and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, AEMC is down 2.17% versus a gain of 13.08% for VYM.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

AEMC charges 0.35% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $4 annually, a gap of $31 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AEMC currently yields 0.00% against 2.22% for VYM.

Holdings Overlap

AEMC already in VYM49.3%
VYM already in AEMC3.9%

49.3% of AEMC's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 3.9% of VYM's money is in holdings AEMC also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

35 positions in common, counted across the 99 positions we hold weights for in AEMC and 557 in VYM, against full books of 99 and 613.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 493 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for AEMC (93.2% of the fund), and 60 for AEMC that do not appear in VYM (47.8%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in AEMCWeight in VYMDifference
MPCMarathon Petroleum Corp4.02%0.38%3.64%
AMPAmeriprise Financial Inc3.29%0.20%3.09%
NTAPNetapp Inc2.81%0.14%2.67%
STTState Street Corp.2.73%0.20%2.53%
IEXI D E X Corporation2.70%0.07%2.63%
SNASnap-On Inc.2.62%0.08%2.54%
CHEChemed Corp2.39%0.03%2.36%
TGTTarget Corp Common Stock Usd.08331.92%0.27%1.65%
RSReliance Steel & Aluminum Co.1.97%0.08%1.89%
GRMNGarminltd.1.78%0.20%1.58%

49.3% of AEMC is already inside VYM.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

AEMCVYM

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, AEMC or VYM?

AEMC has an expense ratio of 0.35% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $31 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between AEMC and VYM?

49.3% of AEMC's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 3.9% of VYM's is in holdings AEMC also owns. They hold 35 positions in common, counted across the 99 positions we hold weights for in AEMC and 557 in VYM.

Which pays a higher dividend, AEMC or VYM?

AEMC yields 0.00% while VYM yields 2.22%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VYM better than AEMC?

VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 27.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.