AFEM vs EMCS

AFEM vs EMCS

Which is better, AFEM or EMCS?

Each has led over a different period.

EMCS has a lower expense ratio. AFEM led over 5Y, EMCS over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.91.

Lower Fees: EMCSHigher Returns: split

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricAFEMEMCS
Expense Ratio0.85%0.15%Best
AUM$74M$1.0B
Dividend Yield2.74%1.53%
Holdings281148
YTD Return+14.07%+17.10%Best
1Y Return+17.39%+21.59%Best
3Y Return (annualized)+21.51%+24.92%Best
5Y Return (annualized)+10.10%Best+7.37%
Volatility (annualized)17.6%Best19.2%
Max Drawdown-36.0%Best-44.9%
$10,000 over 5 years$16,178Best$14,270
Fund FamilyFirst Trust Portfolios (US)Xtrackers ETFs
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionJun 14, 2016Dec 4, 2018

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 6, 2018 to Nov 9, 2026 (7.9 years).

AFEM vs EMCS growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 7.9 years both funds cover.

Compare AFEM against instead:AFEM vs SPYAFEM vs QQQAFEM vs VOOAFEM vs VTIEMCS against:EMCS vs VXUS

AFEM vs EMCS Performance

First Trust Active Factor Emerging Markets ETF (AFEM) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Select ETF (EMCS) is an ETF from Xtrackers ETFs. Over the past year AFEM returned +17.39% while EMCS returned +21.59%. Year to date, AFEM is up 14.07% versus a gain of 17.10% for EMCS.

Over three years, AFEM compounded at +21.51% per year against +24.92% for EMCS; over five years the annualized figures are +10.10% and +7.37% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, EMCS has the edge at +8.92% annualized vs +8.60%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

EMCS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.2% compared with 17.6% for AFEM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -36.0% for AFEM and -44.9% for EMCS. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.91. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

AFEM charges 0.85% per year while EMCS charges 0.15%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $15 annually, a gap of $70 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AFEM currently yields 2.74% against 1.53% for EMCS.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of AFEM and EMCS you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

AFEMEMCS

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, AFEM or EMCS?

AFEM has an expense ratio of 0.85% while EMCS charges 0.15%. EMCS is the cheaper option, by $70 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, AFEM or EMCS?

Over the past year AFEM returned +17.39% vs +21.59% for EMCS, so EMCS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), AFEM annualized +8.60% vs +8.92% for EMCS. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, AFEM or EMCS?

EMCS has been the more volatile fund at 19.2% annualized versus 17.6% for AFEM. Worst drawdown: AFEM -36.0% vs EMCS -44.9%.

Should I hold both AFEM and EMCS?

AFEM and EMCS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.91, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, AFEM or EMCS?

AFEM yields 2.74% while EMCS yields 1.53%, so AFEM currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is EMCS better than AFEM?

EMCS has a lower expense ratio. AFEM led over 5Y, EMCS over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.91. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.