AHLT vs IVV
American Beacon AHL Trend ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. AHLT delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AHLT | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $49M | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.55% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 191 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +10.18% | +14.50% | |
| 1Y Return | +33.16% | +22.02% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +7.26% | +21.80% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.37% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.6% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -20.2% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | American Beacon Funds | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Aug 30, 2023 | May 15, 2000 |
AHLT vs IVV Performance
American Beacon AHL Trend ETF (AHLT) is a ETF from American Beacon Funds and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year AHLT returned +33.16% while IVV returned +22.02%. Year to date, AHLT is up 10.18% versus a gain of 14.50% for IVV.
Over three years, AHLT compounded at +7.26% per year against +21.80% for IVV. Across the full 3-year window we track, AHLT has the edge at +7.26% annualized vs +7.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 14.6% for AHLT. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -20.2% for AHLT and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.07. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AHLT charges 0.95% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $3 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AHLT currently yields 1.55% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
AHLT and IVV share 0 holdings out of 506 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AHLT or IVV?
AHLT has an expense ratio of 0.95% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $92 per year of difference.
Which performed better, AHLT or IVV?
Over the past year AHLT returned +33.16% vs +22.02% for IVV, so AHLT leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), AHLT annualized +7.26% vs +7.07% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, AHLT or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 14.6% for AHLT. Worst drawdown: AHLT -20.2% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both AHLT and IVV?
AHLT and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of -0.07, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between AHLT and IVV?
AHLT and IVV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 506 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, AHLT or IVV?
AHLT yields 1.55% while IVV yields 1.09%, so AHLT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.