AMDL vs IVV
Graniteshares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, AMDL or IVV?
AMDL has been ahead.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. AMDL led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AMDL | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.07% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $1.3B | $882.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 4 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +401.42%Best | +13.60% |
| 1Y Return | +645.50%Best | +16.32% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +23.81% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +14.03% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 175.7% | 11.9%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -88.6% | -18.8%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.5 years | $32,508Best | $15,377 |
| Fund Family | GraniteShares | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Mar 4, 2024 | May 15, 2000 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.5 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Mar 18, 2024 to Oct 2, 2026 (2.5 years).
AMDL vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.5 years both funds cover.
AMDL vs IVV Performance
Graniteshares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDL) is an ETF from GraniteShares and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year AMDL returned +645.50% while IVV returned +16.32%. Year to date, AMDL is up 401.42% versus a gain of 13.60% for IVV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
AMDL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 175.7% compared with 11.9% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -88.6% for AMDL and -18.8% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.56. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AMDL charges 1.07% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $107 vs $3 annually, a gap of $104 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AMDL currently yields 0.00% against 1.06% for IVV.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of AMDL and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AMDL or IVV?
AMDL has an expense ratio of 1.07% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $104 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, AMDL or IVV?
Over the past year AMDL returned +645.50% vs +16.32% for IVV, so AMDL leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, AMDL or IVV?
AMDL has been the more volatile fund at 175.7% annualized versus 11.9% for IVV. Worst drawdown: AMDL -88.6% vs IVV -18.8%.
Should I hold both AMDL and IVV?
AMDL and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.56, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, AMDL or IVV?
AMDL yields 0.00% while IVV yields 1.06%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than AMDL?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. AMDL led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.