AMDL vs VTI
Graniteshares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. AMDL delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AMDL | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.07% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $1.0B | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 2 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +188.73% | +12.65% | |
| 1Y Return | +341.34% | +21.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.54% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.11% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 178.6% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -88.6% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | GraniteShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 4, 2024 | May 24, 2001 |
AMDL vs VTI Performance
Graniteshares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDL) is a ETF from GraniteShares and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year AMDL returned +341.34% while VTI returned +21.39%. Year to date, AMDL is up 188.73% versus a gain of 12.65% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
AMDL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 178.6% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -88.6% for AMDL and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.58. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AMDL charges 1.07% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $107 vs $3 annually, a gap of $104 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AMDL currently yields 0.00% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
AMDL and VTI share 1 holdings out of 2787 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.3% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in AMDL | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMD | 66.67% | 1.30% | 65.37% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AMDL or VTI?
AMDL has an expense ratio of 1.07% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $104 per year of difference.
Which performed better, AMDL or VTI?
Over the past year AMDL returned +341.34% vs +21.39% for VTI, so AMDL leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), AMDL annualized +30.56% vs +8.07% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, AMDL or VTI?
AMDL has been the more volatile fund at 178.6% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: AMDL -88.6% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both AMDL and VTI?
AMDL and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.58, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between AMDL and VTI?
AMDL and VTI share 1 common holdings with a 1.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2787 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, AMDL or VTI?
AMDL yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.