AMOM vs ARKF
Qraft AI-Enhanced US Large Cap Momentum ETF vs ARK Blockchain & Fintech Innovation ETF
Which is better, AMOM or ARKF?
AMOM has been ahead.
AMOM led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AMOM | ARKF |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75%Tie | 0.75%Tie |
| AUM | $23M | $695M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.10% |
| Holdings | 102 | 81 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.9%Best | 38.3% |
| Max Drawdown | -39.7%Best | -78.6% |
| $10,000 over 7.4 years | $29,876Best | $20,963 |
| Fund Family | QRAFT AI ETFs | Ark Invest |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | May 20, 2019 | Feb 1, 2019 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
The two price series end 26 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. AMOM has data through Oct 16, 2026 and ARKF through Nov 11, 2026.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 7.4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: May 21, 2019 to Oct 16, 2026 (7.4 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ARKF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 38.3% compared with 21.9% for AMOM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -39.7% for AMOM and -78.6% for ARKF. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.70. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AMOM charges 0.75% per year while ARKF charges 0.75%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $75 annually. On income, AMOM currently yields 0.00% against 0.10% for ARKF.
Holdings Overlap
At least 19.4% of AMOM's money is in holdings ARKF also owns.
Stated as a floor: for ARKF, our book for it covers 90.3% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
AMOM and ARKF share little of their money.
5 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in AMOM and 36 in ARKF, against full books of 102 and 81.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of AMOM and ARKF you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AMOM or ARKF?
AMOM has an expense ratio of 0.75% while ARKF charges 0.75%. At the precision these are quoted to, they cost the same.
Which is riskier, AMOM or ARKF?
ARKF has been the more volatile fund at 38.3% annualized versus 21.9% for AMOM. Worst drawdown: AMOM -39.7% vs ARKF -78.6%.
Should I hold both AMOM and ARKF?
AMOM and ARKF have a monthly-return correlation of 0.70, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between AMOM and ARKF?
At least 19.4% of AMOM's money is in holdings ARKF also owns. Our book for ARKF is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 5 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in AMOM and 36 in ARKF.
Which pays a higher dividend, AMOM or ARKF?
AMOM yields 0.00% while ARKF yields 0.10%, so ARKF currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is ARKF better than AMOM?
AMOM led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.