AMOM vs VTI
Qraft AI-Enhanced US Large Cap Momentum ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. AMOM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AMOM | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $26M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.04% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 51 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +17.41% | +12.65% | |
| 1Y Return | +28.08% | +21.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +23.53% | +21.54% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.24% | +12.11% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.8% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -39.7% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | QRAFT AI ETFs | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 20, 2019 | May 24, 2001 |
AMOM vs VTI Performance
Qraft AI-Enhanced US Large Cap Momentum ETF (AMOM) is a ETF from QRAFT AI ETFs and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year AMOM returned +28.08% while VTI returned +21.39%. Year to date, AMOM is up 17.41% versus a gain of 12.65% for VTI.
Over three years, AMOM compounded at +23.53% per year against +21.54% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +10.24% and +12.11% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, AMOM has the edge at +16.79% annualized vs +8.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
AMOM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.8% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -39.7% for AMOM and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.85. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AMOM charges 0.75% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $3 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AMOM currently yields 0.04% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
AMOM and VTI share 47 holdings out of 2789 unique holdings combined, representing a 10.8% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AMOM or VTI?
AMOM has an expense ratio of 0.75% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $72 per year of difference.
Which performed better, AMOM or VTI?
Over the past year AMOM returned +28.08% vs +21.39% for VTI, so AMOM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), AMOM annualized +16.79% vs +8.07% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, AMOM or VTI?
AMOM has been the more volatile fund at 21.8% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: AMOM -39.7% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both AMOM and VTI?
AMOM and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.85, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between AMOM and VTI?
AMOM and VTI share 47 common holdings with a 10.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2789 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, AMOM or VTI?
AMOM yields 0.04% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.