AMOM vs VTI
Qraft AI-Enhanced US Large Cap Momentum ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, AMOM or VTI?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. AMOM led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window, VTI over 5Y. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 35.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AMOM | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $21M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.03% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 51 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +16.60%Best | +12.08% |
| 1Y Return | +20.05%Best | +16.31% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +24.11%Best | +20.83% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.93% | +11.89%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.7% | 16.9%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -39.7% | -35.0%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $16,054 | $17,537Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 35.9% | 33.3%Best |
| Fund Family | QRAFT AI ETFs | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 20, 2019 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: May 21, 2019 to Sep 14, 2026 (7.3 years).
AMOM vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 7.3 years both funds cover.
AMOM vs VTI Performance
Qraft AI-Enhanced US Large Cap Momentum ETF (AMOM) is an ETF from QRAFT AI ETFs and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year AMOM returned +20.05% while VTI returned +16.31%. Year to date, AMOM is up 16.60% versus a gain of 12.08% for VTI.
Over three years, AMOM compounded at +24.11% per year against +20.83% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +9.93% and +11.89% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, AMOM has the edge at +16.51% annualized vs +14.87%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
AMOM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.7% compared with 16.9% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -39.7% for AMOM and -35.0% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.85. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AMOM charges 0.75% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $3 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AMOM currently yields 0.03% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
99.5% of AMOM's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 10.0% of VTI's money is in holdings AMOM also owns.
Most of AMOM is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
50 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in AMOM and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 51 and 3,543.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 50 and 3,463 positions we hold weights for.
VTI holds 1,100 positions AMOM does not, 87.4% of the fund.
Largest: NVDA 6.40%, AAPL 6.29%, MSFT 4.79%, AMZN 3.65%, GOOGL 2.90%
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in AMOM | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 5.43% | 1.29% | 4.14% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 4.02% | 1.08% | 2.94% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 4.04% | 0.57% | 3.47% |
| CATCaterpillar, Inc. | 3.79% | 0.52% | 3.27% |
| PANWPalo Alto Networks, Inc | 3.32% | 0.38% | 2.94% |
| GEVGE Vernova Inc. CDR (CAD Hedged) | 3.09% | 0.37% | 2.72% |
| INTCIntel Corporation | 2.96% | 0.50% | 2.46% |
| CRWDCrowdstrike Holdings Inc | 3.08% | 0.26% | 2.82% |
| MRNAModerna therapeutics | 3.19% | 0.03% | 3.16% |
| DELLDell Technologies Inc | 2.95% | 0.16% | 2.79% |
99.5% of AMOM is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AMOM or VTI?
AMOM has an expense ratio of 0.75% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $72 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, AMOM or VTI?
Over the past year AMOM returned +20.05% vs +16.31% for VTI, so AMOM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), AMOM annualized +16.51% vs +14.87% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, AMOM or VTI?
AMOM has been the more volatile fund at 21.7% annualized versus 16.9% for VTI. Worst drawdown: AMOM -39.7% vs VTI -35.0%.
Should I hold both AMOM and VTI?
AMOM and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.85, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between AMOM and VTI?
99.5% of AMOM's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 10.0% of VTI's is in holdings AMOM also owns. They hold 50 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in AMOM and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, AMOM or VTI?
AMOM yields 0.03% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than AMOM?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. AMOM led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window, VTI over 5Y. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 35.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.