AMOM vs VYM
Qraft AI-Enhanced US Large Cap Momentum ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, AMOM or VYM?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. AMOM led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window, VYM over 5Y. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 36.1%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AMOM | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $21M | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.03% | 2.24% |
| Holdings | 51 | 613 |
| YTD Return | +21.18%Best | +14.33% |
| 1Y Return | +29.83%Best | +20.01% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +24.95%Best | +18.43% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.60% | +12.16%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.6% | 15.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -39.7% | -35.7%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $16,549 | $17,750Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 36.1% | 25.9%Best |
| Fund Family | QRAFT AI ETFs | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | May 20, 2019 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: May 21, 2019 to Sep 8, 2026 (7.3 years).
AMOM vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 7.3 years both funds cover.
AMOM vs VYM Performance
Qraft AI-Enhanced US Large Cap Momentum ETF (AMOM) is an ETF from QRAFT AI ETFs and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year AMOM returned +29.83% while VYM returned +20.01%. Year to date, AMOM is up 21.18% versus a gain of 14.33% for VYM.
Over three years, AMOM compounded at +24.95% per year against +18.43% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +10.60% and +12.16% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, AMOM has the edge at +17.16% annualized vs +11.56%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
AMOM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.6% compared with 15.1% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -39.7% for AMOM and -35.7% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.64. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AMOM charges 0.75% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $4 annually, a gap of $71 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AMOM currently yields 0.03% against 2.24% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
37.9% of AMOM's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 9.0% of VYM's money is in holdings AMOM also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
The two holdings books were reported 49 days apart, AMOM as of Aug 18, 2026 and VYM as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
20 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in AMOM and 602 in VYM, against full books of 51 and 613.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 549 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for AMOM (88.3% of the fund), and 29 for AMOM that do not appear in VYM (60.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in AMOM | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc | 4.00% | 1.93% | 2.07% |
| CATCaterpillar, Inc. | 3.91% | 2.01% | 1.90% |
| DELLDell Technologies Inc. | 2.73% | 0.54% | 2.19% |
| TXNTexas Instruments, Inc. | 1.87% | 1.13% | 0.74% |
| MPCMarathon Petroleum Corp. | 2.34% | 0.31% | 2.03% |
| VLOValero Energy Corp | 2.24% | 0.32% | 1.92% |
| PSXPhillips 66 | 2.24% | 0.28% | 1.96% |
| ADIAnalog Devices, Inc. | 1.47% | 0.80% | 0.67% |
| HPEHewlett Packard Enterprise Co. | 2.00% | 0.25% | 1.75% |
| FDXFedex Corp. | 1.95% | 0.28% | 1.67% |
37.9% of AMOM is already inside VYM.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AMOM or VYM?
AMOM has an expense ratio of 0.75% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $71 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, AMOM or VYM?
Over the past year AMOM returned +29.83% vs +20.01% for VYM, so AMOM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), AMOM annualized +17.16% vs +11.56% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, AMOM or VYM?
AMOM has been the more volatile fund at 21.6% annualized versus 15.1% for VYM. Worst drawdown: AMOM -39.7% vs VYM -35.7%.
Should I hold both AMOM and VYM?
AMOM and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.64, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between AMOM and VYM?
37.9% of AMOM's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 9.0% of VYM's is in holdings AMOM also owns. They hold 20 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in AMOM and 602 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, AMOM or VYM?
AMOM yields 0.03% while VYM yields 2.24%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than AMOM?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. AMOM led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window, VYM over 5Y. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 36.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.