AMOM vs VYM
Qraft AI-Enhanced US Large Cap Momentum ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. AMOM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 616 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AMOM | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $26M | $81.6B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.04% | 2.24% | |
| Holdings | 51 | 616 | |
| YTD Return | +18.96% | +15.60% | |
| 1Y Return | +29.81% | +23.48% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +24.10% | +19.07% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.80% | +12.50% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.8% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -39.7% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | QRAFT AI ETFs | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 20, 2019 | Nov 10, 2006 |
AMOM vs VYM Performance
Qraft AI-Enhanced US Large Cap Momentum ETF (AMOM) is a ETF from QRAFT AI ETFs and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year AMOM returned +29.81% while VYM returned +23.48%. Year to date, AMOM is up 18.96% versus a gain of 15.60% for VYM.
Over three years, AMOM compounded at +24.10% per year against +19.07% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +10.80% and +12.50% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, AMOM has the edge at +17.01% annualized vs +7.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
AMOM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.8% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -39.7% for AMOM and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.64. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AMOM charges 0.75% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $4 annually, a gap of $71 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AMOM currently yields 0.04% against 2.24% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
AMOM and VYM share 15 holdings out of 637 unique holdings combined, representing a 6.2% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AMOM or VYM?
AMOM has an expense ratio of 0.75% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $71 per year of difference.
Which performed better, AMOM or VYM?
Over the past year AMOM returned +29.81% vs +23.48% for VYM, so AMOM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), AMOM annualized +17.01% vs +7.05% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, AMOM or VYM?
AMOM has been the more volatile fund at 21.8% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: AMOM -39.7% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both AMOM and VYM?
AMOM and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.64, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between AMOM and VYM?
AMOM and VYM share 15 common holdings with a 6.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 637 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, AMOM or VYM?
AMOM yields 0.04% while VYM yields 2.24%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.