AMOM vs VOO
Qraft AI-Enhanced US Large Cap Momentum ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. AMOM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AMOM | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $26M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.04% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 51 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +19.72% | +12.95% | |
| 1Y Return | +28.24% | +20.69% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +24.39% | +22.09% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.80% | +13.40% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.8% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -39.7% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | QRAFT AI ETFs | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 20, 2019 | Sep 7, 2010 |
AMOM vs VOO Performance
Qraft AI-Enhanced US Large Cap Momentum ETF (AMOM) is a ETF from QRAFT AI ETFs and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year AMOM returned +28.24% while VOO returned +20.69%. Year to date, AMOM is up 19.72% versus a gain of 12.95% for VOO.
Over three years, AMOM compounded at +24.39% per year against +22.09% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +10.80% and +13.40% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, AMOM has the edge at +17.12% annualized vs +13.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
AMOM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.8% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -39.7% for AMOM and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.85. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AMOM charges 0.75% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $3 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AMOM currently yields 0.04% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
AMOM and VOO share 40 holdings out of 514 unique holdings combined, representing a 12.3% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AMOM or VOO?
AMOM has an expense ratio of 0.75% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $72 per year of difference.
Which performed better, AMOM or VOO?
Over the past year AMOM returned +28.24% vs +20.69% for VOO, so AMOM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), AMOM annualized +17.12% vs +13.50% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, AMOM or VOO?
AMOM has been the more volatile fund at 21.8% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: AMOM -39.7% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both AMOM and VOO?
AMOM and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.85, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between AMOM and VOO?
AMOM and VOO share 40 common holdings with a 12.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 514 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, AMOM or VOO?
AMOM yields 0.04% while VOO yields 1.08%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.