AMOM vs VOO
Qraft AI-Enhanced US Large Cap Momentum ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, AMOM or VOO?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. AMOM led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window, VOO over 5Y. AMOM is less concentrated, with 36.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 36.4%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AMOM | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $21M | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.03% | 1.08% |
| Holdings | 51 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +21.18%Best | +12.74% |
| 1Y Return | +29.83%Best | +19.43% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +24.95%Best | +21.18% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.60% | +12.76%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.6% | 16.4%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -39.7% | -34.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $16,549 | $18,230Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 36.1%Best | 36.4% |
| Fund Family | QRAFT AI ETFs | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 20, 2019 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: May 21, 2019 to Sep 8, 2026 (7.3 years).
AMOM vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 7.3 years both funds cover.
AMOM vs VOO Performance
Qraft AI-Enhanced US Large Cap Momentum ETF (AMOM) is an ETF from QRAFT AI ETFs and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year AMOM returned +29.83% while VOO returned +19.43%. Year to date, AMOM is up 21.18% versus a gain of 12.74% for VOO.
Over three years, AMOM compounded at +24.95% per year against +21.18% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +10.60% and +12.76% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, AMOM has the edge at +17.16% annualized vs +15.66%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
AMOM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.6% compared with 16.4% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -39.7% for AMOM and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.85. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AMOM charges 0.75% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $3 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AMOM currently yields 0.03% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
99.6% of AMOM's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 13.9% of VOO's money is in holdings AMOM also owns.
Most of AMOM is already inside VOO. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
The two holdings books were reported 49 days apart, AMOM as of Aug 18, 2026 and VOO as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
50 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in AMOM and 504 in VOO, against full books of 51 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 445 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for AMOM (85.5% of the fund), and 0 for AMOM that do not appear in VOO (0.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in AMOM | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 5.19% | 2.02% | 3.17% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 4.13% | 1.47% | 2.66% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc | 4.00% | 0.72% | 3.28% |
| CATCaterpillar, Inc. | 3.91% | 0.76% | 3.15% |
| INTCIntel Corp. | 3.09% | 1.02% | 2.07% |
| PANWPalo Alto Networks Inc - Common | 3.67% | 0.43% | 3.24% |
| GEVGE Vernova Inc. CDR (CAD Hedged) | 3.27% | 0.49% | 2.78% |
| LRCXLam Research Corp | 2.78% | 0.84% | 1.94% |
| AMATApplied Materials, Inc. | 2.69% | 0.89% | 1.80% |
| CRWDCrowdstrike Holdings Inc - A | 3.13% | 0.30% | 2.83% |
99.6% of AMOM is already inside VOO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AMOM or VOO?
AMOM has an expense ratio of 0.75% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $72 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, AMOM or VOO?
Over the past year AMOM returned +29.83% vs +19.43% for VOO, so AMOM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), AMOM annualized +17.16% vs +15.66% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, AMOM or VOO?
AMOM has been the more volatile fund at 21.6% annualized versus 16.4% for VOO. Worst drawdown: AMOM -39.7% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both AMOM and VOO?
AMOM and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.85, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between AMOM and VOO?
99.6% of AMOM's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 13.9% of VOO's is in holdings AMOM also owns. They hold 50 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in AMOM and 504 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, AMOM or VOO?
AMOM yields 0.03% while VOO yields 1.08%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than AMOM?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. AMOM led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window, VOO over 5Y. AMOM is less concentrated, with 36.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 36.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.