AMOM vs SPYT
Qraft AI-Enhanced US Large Cap Momentum ETF vs Defiance S&P 500 Income Target ETF
Which is better, AMOM or SPYT?
AMOM has been ahead.
AMOM has a lower expense ratio. AMOM led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AMOM | SPYT |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75%Best | 0.92% |
| AUM | $23M | $170M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 20.83% |
| Holdings | 102 | 10 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 23.1% | 10.7%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -30.3% | -18.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.6 years | $14,369Best | $14,233 |
| Fund Family | QRAFT AI ETFs | Defiance ETFs, LLC |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | May 20, 2019 | Mar 7, 2024 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
The two price series end 11 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. AMOM has data through Oct 16, 2026 and SPYT through Oct 27, 2026.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.6 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Mar 7, 2024 to Oct 16, 2026 (2.6 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
AMOM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 23.1% compared with 10.7% for SPYT. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -30.3% for AMOM and -18.3% for SPYT. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.77. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AMOM charges 0.75% per year while SPYT charges 0.92%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $92 annually, a gap of $17 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AMOM currently yields 0.00% against 20.83% for SPYT.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 50 holdings in AMOM and 1 in SPYT, totalling 99.5% and 99.7% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in AMOM and 1 in SPYT, against full books of 102 and 10.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of AMOM and SPYT you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AMOM or SPYT?
AMOM has an expense ratio of 0.75% while SPYT charges 0.92%. AMOM is the cheaper option, by $17 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which is riskier, AMOM or SPYT?
AMOM has been the more volatile fund at 23.1% annualized versus 10.7% for SPYT. Worst drawdown: AMOM -30.3% vs SPYT -18.3%.
Should I hold both AMOM and SPYT?
AMOM and SPYT have a monthly-return correlation of 0.77, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, AMOM or SPYT?
AMOM yields 0.00% while SPYT yields 20.83%, so SPYT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SPYT better than AMOM?
AMOM has a lower expense ratio. AMOM led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.