AMOM vs VXUS
Qraft AI-Enhanced US Large Cap Momentum ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. AMOM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 8,747 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AMOM | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $26M | $158.1B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.04% | 2.59% | |
| Holdings | 51 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +21.99% | +15.22% | |
| 1Y Return | +30.23% | +26.86% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +24.37% | +20.34% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.69% | +9.38% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.9% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -39.7% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | QRAFT AI ETFs | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 20, 2019 | Jan 26, 2011 |
AMOM vs VXUS Performance
Qraft AI-Enhanced US Large Cap Momentum ETF (AMOM) is a ETF from QRAFT AI ETFs and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year AMOM returned +30.23% while VXUS returned +26.86%. Year to date, AMOM is up 21.99% versus a gain of 15.22% for VXUS.
Over three years, AMOM compounded at +24.37% per year against +20.34% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +10.69% and +9.38% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, AMOM has the edge at +17.45% annualized vs +4.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
AMOM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.9% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -39.7% for AMOM and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.67. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AMOM charges 0.75% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $5 annually, a gap of $70 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AMOM currently yields 0.04% against 2.59% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
AMOM and VXUS share 0 holdings out of 7918 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AMOM or VXUS?
AMOM has an expense ratio of 0.75% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $70 per year of difference.
Which performed better, AMOM or VXUS?
Over the past year AMOM returned +30.23% vs +26.86% for VXUS, so AMOM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), AMOM annualized +17.45% vs +4.89% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, AMOM or VXUS?
AMOM has been the more volatile fund at 21.9% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: AMOM -39.7% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both AMOM and VXUS?
AMOM and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.67, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between AMOM and VXUS?
AMOM and VXUS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7918 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, AMOM or VXUS?
AMOM yields 0.04% while VXUS yields 2.59%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.