AOD vs AVNM
AOD vs AVNM
Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund vs Avantis All International Markets Equity ETF
Quick Verdict
AVNM has a lower expense ratio. AOD delivered stronger 1-year returns. AOD offers more diversification with 85 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AOD | AVNM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.16% | 0.31% | |
| AUM | $1.0B | $690M | |
| Dividend Yield | 11.72% | 2.37% | |
| Holdings | 86 | 8 | |
| YTD Return | +18.03% | +15.43% | |
| 1Y Return | +34.72% | +30.04% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.88% | +21.69% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.28% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.9% | 12.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -88.1% | -14.0% | |
| Fund Family | Aberdeen | Avantis Investors | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 26, 2007 | Jun 27, 2023 |
AOD vs AVNM Performance
Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund (AOD) is a ETF from Aberdeen and Avantis All International Markets Equity ETF (AVNM) is a ETF from Avantis Investors. Over the past year AOD returned +34.72% while AVNM returned +30.04%. Year to date, AOD is up 18.03% versus a gain of 15.43% for AVNM.
Over three years, AOD compounded at +22.88% per year against +21.69% for AVNM. Across the full 3-year window we track, AVNM has the edge at +21.91% annualized vs -4.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
AOD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.9% compared with 12.6% for AVNM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -88.1% for AOD and -14.0% for AVNM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.86. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AOD charges 1.16% per year while AVNM charges 0.31%. On a $10,000 position that is $116 vs $31 annually, a gap of $85 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AOD currently yields 11.72% against 2.37% for AVNM.
Holdings Overlap
AOD and AVNM share 0 holdings out of 93 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AOD or AVNM?
AOD has an expense ratio of 1.16% while AVNM charges 0.31%. AVNM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $85 per year of difference.
Which performed better, AOD or AVNM?
Over the past year AOD returned +34.72% vs +30.04% for AVNM, so AOD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), AOD annualized -4.05% vs +21.91% for AVNM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, AOD or AVNM?
AOD has been the more volatile fund at 21.9% annualized versus 12.6% for AVNM. Worst drawdown: AOD -88.1% vs AVNM -14.0%.
Should I hold both AOD and AVNM?
AOD and AVNM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.86, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between AOD and AVNM?
AOD and AVNM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 93 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, AOD or AVNM?
AOD yields 11.72% while AVNM yields 2.37%, so AOD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.