AOD vs IVV
Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. AOD delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AOD | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.16% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $1.0B | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 11.72% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 86 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +18.70% | +13.43% | |
| 1Y Return | +33.40% | +22.61% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +23.21% | +21.47% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.26% | +13.26% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.9% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -88.1% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Aberdeen | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 26, 2007 | May 15, 2000 |
AOD vs IVV Performance
Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund (AOD) is a ETF from Aberdeen and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year AOD returned +33.40% while IVV returned +22.61%. Year to date, AOD is up 18.70% versus a gain of 13.43% for IVV.
Over three years, AOD compounded at +23.21% per year against +21.47% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +11.26% and +13.26% respectively. Across the full 20-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.03% annualized vs -4.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
AOD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.9% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -88.1% for AOD and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.78. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AOD charges 1.16% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $116 vs $3 annually, a gap of $113 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AOD currently yields 11.72% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
AOD and IVV share 40 holdings out of 550 unique holdings combined, representing a 20.6% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AOD or IVV?
AOD has an expense ratio of 1.16% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $113 per year of difference.
Which performed better, AOD or IVV?
Over the past year AOD returned +33.40% vs +22.61% for IVV, so AOD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (20 years), AOD annualized -4.02% vs +7.03% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, AOD or IVV?
AOD has been the more volatile fund at 21.9% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: AOD -88.1% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both AOD and IVV?
AOD and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.78, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between AOD and IVV?
AOD and IVV share 40 common holdings with a 20.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 550 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, AOD or IVV?
AOD yields 11.72% while IVV yields 1.09%, so AOD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.