AOD vs IVV
Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, AOD or IVV?
Each has led over a different period.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. AOD led over 1Y and 3Y, IVV over 5Y and the full window. AOD is less concentrated, with 28.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AOD | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.16% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $1.0B | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 11.73% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 86 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +17.13%Best | +14.14% |
| 1Y Return | +24.70%Best | +17.30% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +24.31%Best | +23.04% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.97% | +13.63%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.9% | 15.5%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -88.1% | -56.5%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $17,600 | $18,944Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 28.5%Best | 37.8% |
| Fund Family | Aberdeen | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jan 26, 2007 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 26, 2007 to Sep 22, 2026 (19.7 years).
AOD vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 19.7 years both funds cover.
AOD vs IVV Performance
Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund (AOD) is an ETF from Aberdeen and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year AOD returned +24.70% while IVV returned +17.30%. Year to date, AOD is up 17.13% versus a gain of 14.14% for IVV.
Over three years, AOD compounded at +24.31% per year against +23.04% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +11.97% and +13.63% respectively. Across the full 20-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +9.45% annualized vs -4.06%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
AOD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.9% compared with 15.5% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -88.1% for AOD and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.78. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AOD charges 1.16% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $116 vs $3 annually, a gap of $113 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AOD currently yields 11.73% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
51.5% of AOD's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 34.8% of IVV's money is in holdings AOD also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
39 positions in common, counted across the 87 positions we hold weights for in AOD and 490 in IVV, against full books of 86 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 443 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for AOD (63.8% of the fund), and 8 for AOD that do not appear in IVV (6.1%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in AOD | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 2.54% | 8.07% | 5.53% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 3.21% | 7.02% | 3.81% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 3.22% | 5.69% | 2.47% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 3.48% | 2.65% | 0.83% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc | 3.49% | 2.39% | 1.10% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 1.67% | 1.44% | 0.23% |
| BACBank of America Corp.: Financials | 1.44% | 0.61% | 0.83% |
| ABBVAbbvie Inc. | 1.33% | 0.68% | 0.65% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 1.30% | 0.66% | 0.64% |
| MRKMerck & Company Inc | 1.35% | 0.55% | 0.80% |
51.5% of AOD is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AOD or IVV?
AOD has an expense ratio of 1.16% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $113 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, AOD or IVV?
Over the past year AOD returned +24.70% vs +17.30% for IVV, so AOD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (20 years), AOD annualized -4.06% vs +9.45% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, AOD or IVV?
AOD has been the more volatile fund at 21.9% annualized versus 15.5% for IVV. Worst drawdown: AOD -88.1% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both AOD and IVV?
AOD and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.78, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between AOD and IVV?
51.5% of AOD's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 34.8% of IVV's is in holdings AOD also owns. They hold 39 positions in common, counted across the 87 positions we hold weights for in AOD and 490 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, AOD or IVV?
AOD yields 11.73% while IVV yields 1.06%, so AOD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than AOD?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. AOD led over 1Y and 3Y, IVV over 5Y and the full window. AOD is less concentrated, with 28.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.