AOD vs QQQ
Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. AOD delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 107 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AOD | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.16% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $1.0B | $486.1B | |
| Dividend Yield | 11.73% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 86 | 107 | |
| YTD Return | +18.92% | +15.95% | |
| 1Y Return | +32.46% | +26.00% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +23.55% | +24.11% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.11% | +13.95% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.9% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -88.1% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Aberdeen | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 26, 2007 | Mar 10, 1999 |
AOD vs QQQ Performance
Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund (AOD) is a ETF from Aberdeen and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year AOD returned +32.46% while QQQ returned +26.00%. Year to date, AOD is up 18.92% versus a gain of 15.95% for QQQ.
Over three years, AOD compounded at +23.55% per year against +24.11% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +11.11% and +13.95% respectively. Across the full 20-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +12.99% annualized vs -4.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 21.9% for AOD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -88.1% for AOD and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.71. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AOD charges 1.16% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $116 vs $18 annually, a gap of $98 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AOD currently yields 11.73% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
AOD and QQQ share 13 holdings out of 176 unique holdings combined, representing a 18.9% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AOD or QQQ?
AOD has an expense ratio of 1.16% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $98 per year of difference.
Which performed better, AOD or QQQ?
Over the past year AOD returned +32.46% vs +26.00% for QQQ, so AOD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (20 years), AOD annualized -4.00% vs +12.99% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, AOD or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 21.9% for AOD. Worst drawdown: AOD -88.1% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both AOD and QQQ?
AOD and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.71, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between AOD and QQQ?
AOD and QQQ share 13 common holdings with a 18.9% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 176 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, AOD or QQQ?
AOD yields 11.73% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so AOD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.