AOD vs VOO
Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. AOD delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AOD | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.16% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $1.0B | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 11.72% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 86 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +18.03% | +13.80% | |
| 1Y Return | +34.72% | +23.71% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.88% | +21.50% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.28% | +13.44% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.9% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -88.1% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Aberdeen | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 26, 2007 | Sep 7, 2010 |
AOD vs VOO Performance
Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund (AOD) is a ETF from Aberdeen and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year AOD returned +34.72% while VOO returned +23.71%. Year to date, AOD is up 18.03% versus a gain of 13.80% for VOO.
Over three years, AOD compounded at +22.88% per year against +21.50% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +11.28% and +13.44% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.58% annualized vs -4.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
AOD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.9% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -88.1% for AOD and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.88. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AOD charges 1.16% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $116 vs $3 annually, a gap of $113 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AOD currently yields 11.72% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
AOD and VOO share 40 holdings out of 550 unique holdings combined, representing a 20.4% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AOD or VOO?
AOD has an expense ratio of 1.16% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $113 per year of difference.
Which performed better, AOD or VOO?
Over the past year AOD returned +34.72% vs +23.71% for VOO, so AOD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), AOD annualized -4.05% vs +13.58% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, AOD or VOO?
AOD has been the more volatile fund at 21.9% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: AOD -88.1% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both AOD and VOO?
AOD and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.88, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between AOD and VOO?
AOD and VOO share 40 common holdings with a 20.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 550 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, AOD or VOO?
AOD yields 11.72% while VOO yields 1.09%, so AOD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.